A heated exchange sparked when someone advocated for government intervention to handle fraud cases. The response was swift and pointed: three simple words that cut through the debate.

"Well, it FAILED."

The exchange highlights a recurring tension within the crypto community—whether centralized authorities can effectively manage fraud compared to decentralized oversight mechanisms. When government solutions repeatedly fall short, the case for community-driven security becomes harder to ignore.

It's a reminder that in Web3 spaces, performance speaks louder than promises. Actions, not bureaucratic processes, determine whether systems actually protect users or just create the illusion of safety.