The emergence of Caldera in the Web3 development field has sparked widespread discussion. This platform promises to enable developers to build their own Rollup chains in just a few days, greatly dropping the entry barrier. For small teams with limited funding, this is undoubtedly a huge opportunity to save a significant amount of time and resources.

However, this convenience also brings potential risks. Developers enjoying the benefits brought by Caldera may also face the dilemma of being constrained by its ecosystem. If there are issues with Caldera's underlying architecture, or if service fees suddenly rise, projects relying on this platform may find themselves in a passive situation.

What is more worthy of attention is the long-term development capability of the Caldera ecosystem. In addition to the initial development tools, developers also need comprehensive support for debugging, upgrading, security auditing, and cross-ecosystem interoperability. If Caldera cannot provide these comprehensive services, it may struggle to meet the long-term needs of projects.

For developers, choosing Caldera is both a liberation and a potential constraint. Whether it can truly gain recognition from the tech community hinges on how to balance convenience and autonomy, as well as how to build an ecosystem that supports the long-term development of projects.

In the context of the current tightening financing environment, Caldera undoubtedly provides a fast-start platform for many innovative projects. However, while developers enjoy this convenience, they also need to carefully consider long-term development and weigh the pros and cons of using third-party frameworks.

Ultimately, whether Caldera can become a true driving force for Web3 development depends on how it addresses these contradictions and how it continuously optimizes its services to meet the growing demands of developers.