🍁 Golden Autumn, Big Prizes Await!
Gate Square Growth Points Lucky Draw Carnival Round 1️⃣ 3️⃣ Is Now Live!
🎁 Prize pool over $15,000+, iPhone 17 Pro Max, Gate exclusive Merch and more awaits you!
👉 Draw now: https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize/?now_period=13&refUid=13129053
💡 How to earn more Growth Points for extra chances?
1️⃣ Go to [Square], tap the icon next to your avatar to enter [Community Center]
2️⃣ Complete daily tasks like posting, commenting, liking, and chatting to rack up points!
🍀 100% win rate — you’ll never walk away empty-handed. Try your luck today!
Details: ht
The Ascending Triangle Trap: My Personal Take on This Overhyped Pattern
I've been watching these so-called "ascending triangle patterns" for years, and honestly? They're not the holy grail everyone makes them out to be. Sure, textbooks paint them as perfect bullish continuation signals, but reality is messier and far more deceptive.
When I spot an ascending triangle forming - that horizontal resistance with rising support underneath - I don't immediately jump for joy like most chart-huggers do. I've been burned too many times by these formations to trust them blindly.
Take that BTC/USD chart from 2020 they love showing around. Yes, it broke upward beautifully, but for every perfect example, I've watched dozens fail spectacularly. The market makers know you're watching these patterns and often use them as bait for retail traders.
That ETH breakdown during the 2018 bear market? Classic example of why blindly trusting these patterns is financial suicide. The "experts" were screaming buy signals while smart money was already positioning for the dump.
What really pisses me off is how trading educators present these patterns as foolproof. They conveniently ignore that ascending triangles work maybe 60% of the time at best. Those aren't odds I'd bet my life savings on.
When I trade these formations now, I'm extremely skeptical. Volume is non-negotiable - if I don't see a significant volume spike on the breakout, I'm staying far away. Too many traders get slaughtered chasing low-volume breakouts that reverse hours later.
Calculating targets by measuring the widest part of the pattern? Pure fantasy in today's manipulated markets. I've had much better success setting more conservative targets and taking profits in chunks rather than waiting for some magical measured move.
False breakouts are the rule, not the exception. The big players know exactly where your stop losses are sitting below those rising support lines, and they'll hunt them before the real move happens. I've learned to place my stops wider than conventional wisdom suggests, even if it means smaller position sizes.
Bottom line: ascending triangles can be useful tools, but approach them with extreme caution. The market doesn't give free money for identifying basic patterns everyone can see. Always assume the formation might fail, always manage risk first, and never trust a breakout until it's confirmed with volume and follow-through.
The trading books won't tell you this, but the most profitable approach is often to anticipate the fake breakout first, then position for the real move after the weak hands get shaken out.