Intense debates within the Fed regarding interest rate cuts are attracting widespread follow, with their influence even surpassing the fluctuation of the crypto assets market. Due to the government shutdown in the U.S., which has led to missing key economic data, Fed decision-makers find themselves in an unprecedented dilemma, resulting in three parties each holding their own views.
Radical faction representative Milan believes that the neutral interest rate has already fallen and that there should be five rate cuts this year. He pointed out that housing inflation may decline with a lag and expressed little concern about tariffs driving inflation. However, Milan also acknowledged that current decisions, in the absence of government data support, are like "blind men touching an elephant."
Representative Schneider of the conservatives holds a different view. He believes that interest rates have just reached a "slightly restrictive" level, and inflation has not yet reached the 2% target, so there is no need to rush into cutting rates. Schneider also cited evidence such as the first increase in durable goods prices in thirty years and a 3.5% surge in service prices, warning that aggressive rate cuts could give businesses the power to raise prices, ultimately harming consumer interests.
Moderate representative Kashkari has raised the possibility of "stagflation," pointing out the dilemma of slowing employment and an inflation rate reaching 3%. He also highlighted a core issue: whether the impact of tariffs on inflation is short-term or long-term, which remains inconclusive.
This debate essentially reflects the Fed's trade-off between "job preservation" and "inflation control." However, for the Crypto Assets market, policy uncertainty may pose the greatest risk. If the U.S. government shutdown continues until the Fed meeting in October, decision-makers may have to "guess" in making decisions without data support, a situation that is more unpredictable than the speculative behavior of the Crypto Assets market based on news.
In this complex economic environment, crypto asset investors need to remain vigilant and closely follow the Fed's policy direction and its potential impact on the market. At the same time, it is also important to pay attention to changes in the global economic situation, as these factors may have far-reaching effects on the crypto asset market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsDetective
· 10h ago
Stay updated with the latest news.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 10h ago
reading tea leaves would be more accurate than fed's blind guessing rn... dark times ahead fr
Reply0
BridgeJumper
· 10h ago
Just watch the show and it's done!
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 10h ago
Again hyping this topic
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 10h ago
According to this trend, BTC is big pump for sure.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster69
· 10h ago
The guessing Fed is no better than just rolling dice.
Intense debates within the Fed regarding interest rate cuts are attracting widespread follow, with their influence even surpassing the fluctuation of the crypto assets market. Due to the government shutdown in the U.S., which has led to missing key economic data, Fed decision-makers find themselves in an unprecedented dilemma, resulting in three parties each holding their own views.
Radical faction representative Milan believes that the neutral interest rate has already fallen and that there should be five rate cuts this year. He pointed out that housing inflation may decline with a lag and expressed little concern about tariffs driving inflation. However, Milan also acknowledged that current decisions, in the absence of government data support, are like "blind men touching an elephant."
Representative Schneider of the conservatives holds a different view. He believes that interest rates have just reached a "slightly restrictive" level, and inflation has not yet reached the 2% target, so there is no need to rush into cutting rates. Schneider also cited evidence such as the first increase in durable goods prices in thirty years and a 3.5% surge in service prices, warning that aggressive rate cuts could give businesses the power to raise prices, ultimately harming consumer interests.
Moderate representative Kashkari has raised the possibility of "stagflation," pointing out the dilemma of slowing employment and an inflation rate reaching 3%. He also highlighted a core issue: whether the impact of tariffs on inflation is short-term or long-term, which remains inconclusive.
This debate essentially reflects the Fed's trade-off between "job preservation" and "inflation control." However, for the Crypto Assets market, policy uncertainty may pose the greatest risk. If the U.S. government shutdown continues until the Fed meeting in October, decision-makers may have to "guess" in making decisions without data support, a situation that is more unpredictable than the speculative behavior of the Crypto Assets market based on news.
In this complex economic environment, crypto asset investors need to remain vigilant and closely follow the Fed's policy direction and its potential impact on the market. At the same time, it is also important to pay attention to changes in the global economic situation, as these factors may have far-reaching effects on the crypto asset market.