Arbitrum keeps proving why it's the builder's choice.

I've watched teams choose their launch chains, and the pattern is clear. When serious projects look for a home, they pick @arbitrum. Not because of marketing. Because of fundamentals.

Take @idOS_network, for example. They're chain-agnostic infrastructure compatible with 40+ chains. Yet they chose to launch their Economy Network natively on Arbitrum.

Why? Alignment.

Arbitrum already serves where users are. Around 2.4 million monthly active users, more than 16 billion dollars in value secured, and about 8.5 billion in stablecoins. These aren't vanity metrics. They show where real economic activity happens.

But here's what I find most interesting. Projects don't choose Arbitrum for one reason. They choose it for alignment across three dimensions.

First, user alignment. Your users are already there. You're building where people transact, where liquidity lives, where the stablecoin economy thrives.

Second, mission alignment. Arbitrum attracts projects focused on real utility. Neobanks, RWA protocols, apps driving financial inclusion. The ecosystem shares values.

Third, builder alignment. Low gas fees and high throughput matter. Security inherited from Ethereum matters. But developer support makes the difference.

Programs like security audit support and DRIP show Arbitrum Foundation treats builders as partners not customers.

In my opinion, this is why Arbitrum keeps winning. The infrastructure works, the community delivers, and the foundation supports you.

Arbitrum everywhere