The immortals seen in the square are clearly breakable or not just by looking at them; if one breaks, look at the next one, and if one doesn't break, look at the previous one.

You tell me, which of these levels you provided and the famous Fibonacci technical indicators is more accurate?
There is a very straightforward saying that this candlestick has no support or resistance; it simply concentrated more chips at a certain level.
You might not understand this sentence, so let me put it another way. Normally, network fluctuations are quite common in a city, but when a lot of people gather in a particular place, the network gets congested. This place isn't inherently a pressure point or a support; it's just that there happen to be many people there.
Returning to the Fibonacci and this pile of things whose names I can't recall, originally Fibonacci was actually nothing special; it was just that many people started using it, and as they used it, the chips concentrated there, which then became support or resistance.
So it can be understood like this, right!
So where do you think the advantages lie in the row of points you provided compared to Fibonacci? Your points have 3000 followers, but how many people are using Fibonacci? You tell me, if the network lags, is it your lag or Fibonacci's lag?
Thinking from a different perspective, both give a series of points, and within that series of points, any point is both unknown whether it can break down or hold support. Why not use the existing Fibonacci instead of relying on yours? Do you think you are the emperor with an extra bell🔔??
This problem is easy to solve; just pull Fibonacci, and the points will come out automatically. Take out a recent point: how to handle it if it breaks, and how to handle it if it doesn't break. Everyone is an analyst. And you guys, the foolish coins, I am really amazed. Do you really have no brains? Is the logic that I have to scold you about every day something you just can't understand? Today I compare you with Fibonacci, and tomorrow I compare you with trend lines. Don't tell me you can't draw trend lines? After you draw it, what happens if it breaks, and what happens if it doesn't break? You absolutely know more than analysts about naked candlestick doji engulfing and other chaotic patterns, you just don't dare to use it and don't trust yourselves. To put it bluntly, they are all these things. And that Bollinger Band, does it know itself if it breaks? That Bollinger Band system is generated automatically; you fill in whatever parameters you want. If you put Trump in there, the upper band means that if Trump doesn't step down, then what happens, and if he steps down, then what happens. For the lower band, you fill in Powell: if he doesn't step down next year, then what happens and if he steps down, what happens. For the middle band, if you really have no one to fill in, put in some random coin and see if it can tame these two idiots. This ridiculous thing can still trap you every day and deceive you. You're all grown-ups; can't you use your brains a little?