Meme coin research is not about guessing big or small. How high is the success rate of retail investors who rely on data?

Seeing the major exchanges launch Chinese Ticker contracts, I have to admit that this is indeed a significant boost to the confidence of the entire ecosystem. For those of us who are deeply involved in Meme coins and doing research and investment, this is to some extent a recognition—that this track is moving toward standardization and being taken seriously.

Many people see crypto projects (especially Meme coins) as unregulated gambling. But what is the reality? Quite the opposite.

My observation is: those who truly put effort into investment research, understand retail investor psychology, exchange ecosystems, and even the empathy behind a meme, their win rates far surpass those of players relying purely on luck. This is not hype; it’s a fact that data can prove. The core of research and investment is this—if the win rate after research exceeds random chance, then research has real value.

Take this recent case as an example. I’ve been watching this project for a while, adding to my position at several key points, from early holdings to its contract launch, I’ve been sharing this opportunity along the way. Today’s price increase and gains are actually within expected ranges. This feeling is hard to explain clearly to those who only look at the surface and judge after the fact.

In the BNB Chain ecosystem, this project has broken many of the “rules” that once existed. There will definitely be more opportunities in the future, but will it hit a straight top in the near term? Not necessarily. Anyone’s growth is not a straight line, and the market is the same.

I see some community members complaining that the platform doesn’t want it to fall—honestly, that logic doesn’t hold much water. This way of thinking is approaching moral coercion. The platform is calculating carefully—when it washed from 500 million to 100 million, it didn’t place sell orders, and that actually washed out a lot of indecisive people.

In the short term, I won’t short the market. First, because the significance of the first Chinese Ticker symbol is too strong; second, the risk of catching the top is indeed very high. But I also won’t blindly chase the rise. Short-term price fluctuations with market sentiment are normal. What truly matters is my recognition of the emotional connotations of this project, so my plan is to hold long-term. As long as those who stay committed ultimately succeed in this project, that’s enough.

Speaking of persistence and long-term holding, I still have some confidence in that area.