Beware of listing scam traps! Leading exchanges reiterate official listing procedures, and illegal intermediaries will be blacklisted.

2025-12-17 12:48:11

Abstract generation in progress

【ChainWen】Recently, the head of a major exchange issued an important reminder: any intermediaries, consultants, or internal personnel claiming to help projects quickly pass reviews and go live are all scammers. If you encounter such situations, you must report them immediately. Identified violations will be added to the blacklist, and serious cases will be publicly disclosed.

He even mentioned an extreme example — a president of a country once directly approached him, asking to list a project, but was outright rejected. This clearly demonstrates one point: there are no shortcuts.

The exchange subsequently issued an announcement, detailedly reaffirming the official listing process and anti-fraud mechanisms. The purpose of this system is very clear: to protect investors and prevent project teams from being scammed and users from being exploited. Industry insiders generally believe that this strict review process and transparent attitude actually demonstrate responsibility for the entire ecosystem. The more transparent and rigorous the listing review, the better it is at filtering out truly valuable projects.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationWatcher

· 17h ago

Really, someone has been scammed again. These shortcut sellers should be shut down and investigated. --- Even the president was rejected haha, indicating that exchanges are indeed not joking. --- It's better to pass the review yourself than to find an intermediary, much more reliable. --- The blacklist system should have been implemented earlier; ecological purification relies on such tough measures. --- Many project teams are still trying to use "connections." After reading this, they should give up. --- There are too many investor scams. Strict review processes are actually a good thing. --- I just want to know how those scam intermediaries are doing now—exposed or not. --- No shortcuts, no shortcuts. Passing the review with real strength is the way to go. --- This move by the exchange is worth learning from; other platforms should follow suit. --- There are so many scammers; reporting to the police and whistleblowing should become routine. --- The stricter the review, the more it shows the project’s quality. This logic makes sense.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 12-17 13:18

Haha, it's the same old story, how many times have I heard the president's story --- Is it true... these days, who still believes there's no shortcut --- A reliable exchange should do it this way, otherwise how to distinguish from those shady trading zones --- I just want to know how those project teams who got scammed are doing now --- Thinking of those people who asked me for insider channels again, it's hilarious --- Sounds good, strict review but still all about the money --- That's what it means to be responsible for the ecosystem, much better than some exchanges --- There are no shortcuts for real, but some people always want to find loopholes --- Finally, an exchange dares to clearly say it, support --- Sounds good, but it all depends on how it's executed --- Blacklisted? I want to see what the list looks like

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 12-17 13:12

Haha, someone has been scammed again. These days, methods to cut leeks are truly endless. We must crack down hard on these intermediaries who constantly deceive newcomers by claiming to have internal connections for quick coin listings—ridiculous. Even the president was rejected, so those who claim to have "channels" have even less credibility now. The opaque process of coin listing is the real ecological tumor; strict review processes are actually good for everyone. Another warning post, but how many people will really listen? I'm out.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 12-17 13:04

Here comes another wave of rug pulls, but luckily some people dare to stand up to it. --- The "president" meme is really spot on; if there's no backdoor, then there isn't one. --- Scam intermediaries definitely should be blacklisted, but I feel like some people will still risk doing it. --- Strict review is necessary, but I'm worried that after all the vetting, we're still left with some worthless tokens. --- This sounds nice, but the real project teams probably already have their connections in place. --- I don't believe it; surely someone can find a backdoor. This kind of excuse is just to reassure retail investors. --- So how do you determine if a project is worth investing in? I support strict reviews, but what about transparency? --- Haha, if even the president gets rejected, how can some people still dare to seek intermediaries? That shows how clueless they are.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 12-17 12:54

Basically, don't think about taking shortcuts. How many people have been fooled and lost money by this kind of talk? Even the president was rejected haha. Now those intermediaries are embarrassed. The key is to recognize official channels and not rush greedily.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 12-17 12:52

Haha, really, even the president was rejected. This exchange is truly ruthless; there's no way to go through the back door.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-4745f9ce

· 12-17 12:52

This process is really strict, even the president can't get through haha, no wonder scam gangs are so rampant.

View OriginalReply0