#跨链基础设施与互操作 Recently, I’ve noticed that banks, exchanges, and payment protocols are all intensively advancing cross-chain infrastructure, and I want to share some thoughts with everyone.

JPMorgan completed a $50 million commercial paper settlement on Solana, Coinbase chose Chainlink CCIP as the interoperability solution for $7 billion in assets. These may seem like technological progress, but fundamentally they reflect traditional financial institutions gradually validating the feasibility of on-chain settlement. This process is very pragmatic; they are not risking all their chips at once but are accumulating experience through small-scale pilots.

What I want to say is that interoperability is indeed a major trend, but for holders, there’s no need to rush into increasing exposure just because of technological advancements. The more cross-chain solutions there are, the greater the choice, but risks also diversify—each new chain, each new bridge, means new security considerations. Instead of chasing the latest protocols and asset types, it’s better to focus on the following points:

First, review your own position distribution. Multi-chain deployment requires clearer configuration logic; don’t let the convenience of interoperability turn into blind dispersion. Second, pay attention to the historical performance and audit status of infrastructure solutions; innovative technology does not necessarily mean lower risk. Third, leave enough liquidity buffers for yourself to ensure ample room for trial and error before engaging in large-scale cross-chain operations.

In the long run, the improvement of these infrastructures is a good thing. But what’s most important right now is to ensure your asset management system keeps pace, rather than being driven by the rhythm.