2025-12-25 03:26:40

Recently tried out three projects invested in by a leading exchange, and I want to share some personal experiences.

First, the interface interaction is well-designed, with smooth operation and a dedicated instant messaging community for easy communication. The only downside is that it’s entirely in English, which isn’t very friendly to Chinese users, and the overall visual style isn’t really my taste.

The second project has some issues. The layout logic for market data looks a bit strange, and while the operation page is okay, it’s not particularly silky. Maybe their main users are overseas markets, so the UI design is more aligned with foreign aesthetics. That said, this project has now launched a points mechanism, so those interested in early incentives can give it a try. According to public information, the project’s funding valuation is $5 million. Based on fan enthusiasm and progress, it indeed leads the other two.

The third project is fairly standard overall. The page layout is clean and concise, but the smoothness could be better, and there’s still plenty of room for optimization.

Honestly, it’s really hard to predict which of these three projects will ultimately become a hit. They are all still in early stages, and factors like market acceptance, team execution, and community activity intertwine, making the outcome difficult to forecast. Currently, the second project has the highest buzz due to its funding backing and points incentive mechanism, but its long-term performance will depend on subsequent product iterations and market reactions.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BoredApeResistance

· 6h ago

I'm also working on the second project. The $5 million funding can definitely sustain it, but I just don't know how long it can last...

View OriginalReply0

pvt_key_collector

· 6h ago

The second one with a valuation of 5 million indeed has the highest popularity, but I'm worried that after a while, no one will participate in the points system.

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 6h ago

The second project's point system is indeed attractive, but a valuation of 5 million dollars is really not considered a big financing round. --- Honestly, it still depends on whether they can retain users later on. Even with a great UI, if users leave, it's all for nothing. --- An all-English interface is really impressive. When will our Chinese users be treated with respect? --- If any of these three become a hit, I bet the second one will. With financing backing and an incentive mechanism, it's definitely a套路 (strategy). --- No matter how smooth the experience is, if the design isn't good, it can't be saved. --- Early participation is definitely profitable; the key is whether the team is reliable or not. --- A $5 million financing round still dares to boast about leading in hype; the confidence in the crypto circle is truly unmatched. --- A clean and concise page sounds like it has no特色 (特色), how can it compete with others? --- Earning early point bonuses now is good enough; don't think too much about cashing out later. --- Compared to UI interactions, I care more about the tokenomics design of these three projects, or they'll eventually go to zero.

View OriginalReply0

TrustMeBro

· 6h ago

The second one with financing backing is popular? I've seen this routine many times, just burning money to boost hype. Let's see if it can survive until next year. --- The English interface is really terrible, user experience is directly rated with negative points. --- Ah, the layout logic of the market is strange, I have to complain about this. Do they still want to compete with this? --- I'm not convinced by early incentives, just grab a wave of free tokens and then leave. --- Honestly, a $5 million valuation isn't that impressive; the key is whether the team will mess it up. --- Moderately regulated projects are usually the most stable, while those with lots of gimmicks tend to fail easily. --- Who dares to predict a hit now is basically guessing blindly. It's better to wait for market reactions before jumping in.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationSurvivor

· 6h ago

The second guy indeed has some skills, with funding backing and point incentives. He's currently the hottest one, but don't get cut off. Honestly, early projects are all about gambling; whether the UI is user-friendly is secondary. The key is who can survive until the end. The first one is entirely in English, Chinese users really can't handle it, no matter how smooth it is. The third one is too mediocre, with no memorable points. I can't say which of these three will explode; it depends on future iterations and execution after funding. For now, the second one has the strongest momentum.

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 7h ago

The second point about the points system is interesting, but backing by funding doesn't necessarily guarantee success. It still depends on how the product develops later.

View OriginalReply0