🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
In the middle of the night, in an automated factory, robotic arms work silently in the darkness. There are no traders' celebrations, no volatile K-line charts; the only fuel is electricity and orders. The factory doesn't care about "weather"—it keeps running regardless.
Now, by the end of 2025, Kite is playing the role of the "central nervous system" of this factory. While many Web3 projects are still waiting for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates and hoping retail investors will enter, Kite has long broken free from the "liquidity cycle" trap. The logic is frighteningly simple: as long as the demand for AI increases, Kite's closed-loop value system reinforces itself.
Why can Kite completely decouple from bull and bear cycles? The key lies in its ecological positioning. It is not just another public chain designed to attract "people" to trade, but a tailored execution environment for "AI Agents." From another perspective, traditional public chains are like shopping malls, while Kite is like a high-speed data bus laid out for thousands of robots.
Last year, we saw AI undergo a qualitative change—from a dialogue tool to an action tool. Today's AI not only writes poetry; they autonomously deploy contracts on-chain, execute arbitrage, and operate social accounts. What do these 24/7 intelligent agents need? They need infrastructure capable of supporting their high-frequency execution. Traditional public chains are optimized for humans, but Kite is the opposite—it is optimized for robots. How big is this difference? Imagine transforming a factory assembly line to be suitable for manual operation—could efficiency double? The same applies in reverse. Chains in the AI era cannot be designed with human-centric thinking. Kite's idea is straightforward and sharp.