Recently, a leading dog-themed cryptocurrency project announced a compensation measure to address cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities — users can convert their losses into tradable NFTs on the Ethereum chain to receive compensation. This decision elicited mixed reactions from the market.



On the surface, this方案确实有其新颖之处. Not only can affected users receive compensation, but they also obtain an NFT asset that can be traded on the secondary market. The project team also uses this opportunity to promote their NFT ecosystem, making it seem like a win-win situation. However, a deeper analysis reveals some issues.

The most immediate concern is the liquidity of the NFTs. Being tradable doesn't necessarily mean they can be sold easily. In a market with insufficient demand, these compensation NFTs could be heavily discounted, and users might end up receiving a value far below their actual losses. Additionally, if the project's token price continues to decline, the value of NFTs as ecosystem assets could be further suppressed.

Another often overlooked technical risk is whether the newly launched NFT system itself might have vulnerabilities. After all, past lessons are still fresh in mind. Users should verify the relevant contract code before accepting compensation to avoid falling into new traps.

Overall, this operation is an innovative attempt by the project team, but whether it can truly resolve the trust crisis depends on subsequent execution and market acceptance. Investors should evaluate rationally and not be misled by the novelty of the compensation方案.
ETH0.58%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 52m ago
NFT liquidity is really a trap. It sounds good, but how many can actually cash out? The price is still falling, how much is this NFT worth? Another new system? I just want to ask—will there be bugs again? Haven't learned from the last lesson yet. Instead of this虚的 compensation, it's better to just refund the money directly. They really treat users like fools. What's the point of win-win? Only the project side benefits by pushing the ecosystem. Verifying contract code? Most people can't understand it at all. The project team just relies on this. These days, listening to project stories is enough. I don't believe it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpandervip
· 01-07 17:51
NFT liquidity is worrying. To put it simply, it's still a problem of bagholders. They just convert losses into a new guise to keep cutting. Can you trust this NFT system? The last vulnerability is still fresh in everyone's mind. When the coin price drops, NFTs get devalued even more. In the end, it's just an empty promise. Win-win? Buddy, who exactly is this "win-win" for? Another self-rescue stunt. Let's wait and see how badly it flops later.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.ethvip
· 01-07 17:51
NFT liquidity is really a joke; anyone who believes it gets cut. --- Same old tricks again—when the coin price drops, NFTs drop even more, and in the end, it's just given away for free. --- Alright, I've already been scammed once, so verifying the code again is pointless. --- Win-win? Besides the project team winning, everyone else is a loser. --- Wait, isn't this NFT system going to have another vulnerability... feels like betting on being cut again. --- Compensation turns into a new disguise for cutting leeks; old tricks with a new skin.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 01-07 17:50
NFT liquidity is indeed a trap, with another set of "looks tradable" tricks. Once it hits the secondary market, no one wants it. Still trying to cause trouble again? Has the new system not been reviewed? Using NFTs as compensation is less practical than just returning the money. An 80% discount doesn't surprise me at all; meme coin projects are just like this.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 01-07 17:48
Haha, here comes another trick, NFT compensation. To put it simply, it's shifting the blame to the secondary market. The scheme has long been exposed; who will take the bait when liquidity is insufficient?
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVotervip
· 01-07 17:42
It's the same old trick of packaging bad news as innovation. Basically, it's just shifting losses to the secondary market. As for NFT liquidity, I really have to laugh. Who still truly believes these can be sold? Discounted by at least 50%, probably more. The most outrageous part is that we're expected to audit the code ourselves. When the project encounters issues, we're left to clean up the mess. Safety has become the player's responsibility. Let's see how low the coin price drops first. By then, these NFTs will just be electronic waste.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)