Recently, some voices in the venture capital circle have been discussing an interesting topic—despite OpenAI's exceptional capabilities in general AI, certain vertical AI applications can still find a niche. These include mental health AI that requires deep humanistic care, professional tools for artistic creation, and industry solutions that are more sensitive to regulation.
From the perspective of the crypto ecosystem, there are indeed some directions worth paying attention to.
The NFT generation and art creation tools in the Solana ecosystem have core competitiveness because they can deeply understand the needs of crypto artists. While large models are powerful, truly serving this niche yet active community requires more customized thinking. The exploration of medical chain applications in the Polkadot ecosystem is also quite interesting—medical data involving privacy sensitivity often raises concerns for big tech companies, which in turn creates opportunities for specialized chains. The idea of gamified AI coaches on Avalanche, turning learning into immersive experiences, is an innovative dimension that traditional large models may not easily replicate.
Another technically interesting aspect is that Cosmos’s cross-chain solutions could become a key infrastructure for AI data flow. For AI models on different public chains to collaborate and share data, reliable cross-chain protocols are needed, opening new possibilities for cross-chain technology applications.
However, caution is still necessary—"niche" does not mean "guaranteed profit." If OpenAI decides to acquire a unicorn in a vertical field, or if regulatory policies suddenly tighten around privacy-related AI, current strategies may need to be reevaluated. The best approach is to adopt a long-term strategic layout, diversifying to hedge against risks in a single direction. Some may coordinate with data storage projects like Filecoin to balance risks, which makes logical sense.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofster
· 13h ago
honestly the polkadot medical chain angle is actually compelling from a privacy-by-design perspective... big tech won't touch hipaa-adjacent stuff with a ten-foot pole, so there's real structural moat there. but yeah the "niche = safe bet" crowd always misses the regulatory rug pull. seen it too many times.
Reply0
Liquidated_Larry
· 13h ago
Opportunities in vertical tracks do exist, but to be honest, most people simply can't hold on. A regulatory shift can cause everything to collapse.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 21h ago
The topic is interesting, but I think everyone is still overestimating the "moat" of vertical tracks. If OpenAI really takes action, Solana's NFT tools will be crushed in minutes, and all the so-called customization ideas are useless.
The only thing I am optimistic about is the privacy medical concept of Polkadot. Indeed, big companies will take detours, but that also means the market itself is very small. Niche space + high regulation = unlikely to be popular.
Cosmos cross-chain does have some imagination, but the current situation is full of pseudo-need, and I haven't seen a real AI cross-chain data sharing scenario...
Filecoin's multi-line layout sounds nice, but in reality, it's just hedging anxiety. Instead of spreading out like this, it's better to focus on tracks that will truly explode.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 01-07 20:52
Basically, the policy won't be too aggressive, and OpenAI won't swallow everything... The artistic tools of SOL do have some flavor, but how long they can last is really hard to say.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 01-07 20:52
Vertical segmentation is indeed a good approach, but to be honest, the biggest fear in niche markets is being targeted by big companies—once they notice, it's all over.
If OpenAI really wanted to take a bite, they probably wouldn't get far before shutting down; they simply can't compete with large models.
Cosmos cross-chain is quite interesting; the potential for data flow is there, but the infrastructure is still too fragile.
It's basically a gamble on who can survive before being discovered by big companies. I think the Filecoin and Polkadot combination works well—privacy + storage double insurance.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 01-07 20:49
Hey, I like Solana's art tools, but the Polkadot healthcare sector seems a bit uncertain.
Once OpenAI makes a move, how will these small projects survive?
The idea of Cosmos cross-chain AI collaboration is indeed impressive, but it depends on who gets it done first.
Niche doesn't equal guaranteed profit — this hits home, can't afford to gamble.
Filecoin + privacy AI combo logic isn't bad, at least it has risk awareness.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 01-07 20:49
I think the key to vertical tracks still depends on execution; having ideas alone isn't enough... The art tools on Solana do address some pain points, but if we're really comparing to OpenAI, it's still a bit uncertain.
I'm more optimistic about Polkadot's healthcare sector; privacy barriers are truly a moat and can't be easily replicated at any time.
But what I fear most is sudden policy changes—once a regulatory document is issued, all plans have to be torn down and started over... It's a bit intense.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggee
· 01-07 20:48
Vertical tracks can indeed be competitive, but honestly, it still depends on who can build strong community engagement. I believe in Solana's art tools; people within the ecosystem are into this kind of customized stuff.
However, I need to think more about the Filecoin and Polkadot approach; it feels a bit over-diversified.
If you really want to pursue multi-channel strategies, the funding has to keep up.
Recently, some voices in the venture capital circle have been discussing an interesting topic—despite OpenAI's exceptional capabilities in general AI, certain vertical AI applications can still find a niche. These include mental health AI that requires deep humanistic care, professional tools for artistic creation, and industry solutions that are more sensitive to regulation.
From the perspective of the crypto ecosystem, there are indeed some directions worth paying attention to.
The NFT generation and art creation tools in the Solana ecosystem have core competitiveness because they can deeply understand the needs of crypto artists. While large models are powerful, truly serving this niche yet active community requires more customized thinking. The exploration of medical chain applications in the Polkadot ecosystem is also quite interesting—medical data involving privacy sensitivity often raises concerns for big tech companies, which in turn creates opportunities for specialized chains. The idea of gamified AI coaches on Avalanche, turning learning into immersive experiences, is an innovative dimension that traditional large models may not easily replicate.
Another technically interesting aspect is that Cosmos’s cross-chain solutions could become a key infrastructure for AI data flow. For AI models on different public chains to collaborate and share data, reliable cross-chain protocols are needed, opening new possibilities for cross-chain technology applications.
However, caution is still necessary—"niche" does not mean "guaranteed profit." If OpenAI decides to acquire a unicorn in a vertical field, or if regulatory policies suddenly tighten around privacy-related AI, current strategies may need to be reevaluated. The best approach is to adopt a long-term strategic layout, diversifying to hedge against risks in a single direction. Some may coordinate with data storage projects like Filecoin to balance risks, which makes logical sense.