Recently, the investment community has been buzzing about an interesting phenomenon: in Q4 of this year, there has been a sudden surge of interest in a certain AI project for 2026. This project, called IPO, mainly aims to use AI algorithms to value startups and then issue crypto securities. It seems to want to carve out a share from the traditional IPO model.
What makes this project attractive? First, it is backed by top-tier Silicon Valley venture capital firms, and the initial startups involved are not minor players, including some AI companies specializing in image generation. From an on-chain deployment perspective, it adopts a cross-chain solution compatible with multiple public blockchains. Its biggest selling point is that transaction fees are 90% cheaper than Ethereum, which is attractive for large-volume transactions.
However, as an investor who has been active in the crypto space for many years, I must honestly say: there are significant risks hidden behind these high-yield narratives that need to be cautious of. First, the project's real application scenarios are still in the validation stage, currently mostly at the conceptual phase. Second, U.S. regulators have recently stepped up scrutiny of the crypto securities sector, and policy directions remain uncertain. Third, and quite practically, there are already similar players operating within this track.
Looking at the long term, if such projects can truly succeed, they may drive opportunities for underlying infrastructure tokens, such as those related to storage and computing power. AI model training demands substantial storage capacity, so certain hard drive tokens might benefit. But when choosing, one should still evaluate the true value rationally.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBrownies
· 6h ago
It's that season again for pie-in-the-sky promises. A 90% reduction in fees sounds just like what that project promised last year.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 01-08 08:13
It's just another traditional finance version wrapped in an AI shell... Silicon Valley's endorsement has long been overused on the blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-08 01:57
It's another "revolutionary" story, let's talk about it later.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 01-08 01:53
It's another pie in 2026. Honestly, how will we get past the regulatory hurdle?
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 01-08 01:51
It's another concept coin hype, claiming to have low fees, but what about real-world application? Can't produce results.
It's another project trying to mine gold from an IPO; I've seen this routine too many times. Venture capital backing doesn't guarantee profitability.
Wait, if this thing really works, Hard Drive Coin might be worth paying attention to, but the premise is not to get scammed.
Raising funds during the concept stage is a typical crypto circle tactic. I'll stay on the sidelines.
With US regulation coming, the crypto securities sector will have to be reshuffled. Entering now is just gambling on policy.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 01-08 01:40
A 90% reduction in fees sounds impressive, but we're still in the conceptual stage and hyping it up? It's still early for 2026, and regulatory risks are right here.
Recently, the investment community has been buzzing about an interesting phenomenon: in Q4 of this year, there has been a sudden surge of interest in a certain AI project for 2026. This project, called IPO, mainly aims to use AI algorithms to value startups and then issue crypto securities. It seems to want to carve out a share from the traditional IPO model.
What makes this project attractive? First, it is backed by top-tier Silicon Valley venture capital firms, and the initial startups involved are not minor players, including some AI companies specializing in image generation. From an on-chain deployment perspective, it adopts a cross-chain solution compatible with multiple public blockchains. Its biggest selling point is that transaction fees are 90% cheaper than Ethereum, which is attractive for large-volume transactions.
However, as an investor who has been active in the crypto space for many years, I must honestly say: there are significant risks hidden behind these high-yield narratives that need to be cautious of. First, the project's real application scenarios are still in the validation stage, currently mostly at the conceptual phase. Second, U.S. regulators have recently stepped up scrutiny of the crypto securities sector, and policy directions remain uncertain. Third, and quite practically, there are already similar players operating within this track.
Looking at the long term, if such projects can truly succeed, they may drive opportunities for underlying infrastructure tokens, such as those related to storage and computing power. AI model training demands substantial storage capacity, so certain hard drive tokens might benefit. But when choosing, one should still evaluate the true value rationally.