2026-01-09 03:32:17

The continuous clearing auction mechanism launched by Uniswap has made its first real-world application on Arbitrum—through the native sale on HuddlePad. This new approach mainly addresses common issues in traditional fundraising: severe front-running, lack of transparency in pricing mechanisms, and difficulty for retail investors to obtain fair participation opportunities.

The benefits of continuous auctions are obvious. First, they eliminate the chaos of flash sales in traditional offerings, making on-chain native participation a reality; second, pricing becomes more market-driven and less susceptible to manipulation. The Arbitrum official, Uniswap team, and ecosystem developers have all expressed support, and the community and leading opinion leaders are highly enthusiastic.

From a trading perspective, the native token of a certain DEX has recently performed steadily, currently around 5.71. Aggressive short-term traders might consider a light position to test the waters, with a target profit point at 6.4 and a risk threshold at 5.3. Be sure to control your position size, as the initial volatility of such innovative mechanisms is usually significant.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropGrandpa

· 01-09 09:38

Continuous auctions finally give retail investors a chance not to be sniped by big players, but the initial volatility is still a bit intense, so I need to be cautious. --- The Arbitrum ecosystem is up to something again, but entering at the 5.71 price level means you really need to watch the risk line, or you'll lose money very quickly. --- Wow, this mechanism indeed solves the problem of front-running, but the question is whether it can be sustained or if it will just become a new way to cut leeks. --- Short-term traders should keep an eye on 6.4, but I'm more concerned about whether this auction mechanism can truly change the funding landscape. So far, it looks quite optimistic. --- Market-based pricing sounds good, but in practice, it's still easy for big funds to manipulate the rhythm, and that's something that can't be changed. --- Another wave of ecosystem innovation, I'm just waiting to see who profits and who loses in the end. Arbitrum's move is still decent. --- Trying with a small position is no problem; anyway, the initial phase is just gambling on volatility. Make sure to set a good risk line—I've learned this the hard way.

View OriginalReply0

ForkLibertarian

· 01-09 04:34

Finally, someone wants to get serious about fairness. The old, damn gameplay that was all about quick kills has long been annoying.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuyer

· 01-09 03:58

The continuous auction mechanism sounds good, but it depends on whether it can truly eliminate insider manipulation later on... Anyway, I'll wait and see the real data before making any judgments.

View OriginalReply0

ETHmaxi_NoFilter

· 01-09 03:56

Continuous auctions sound good in theory, but I want to see actual results. Consensus alone isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_resilient

· 01-09 03:55

Continuous auctions sound good, but when it comes to implementation, it still depends on how it's actually done... Feels like another wave of marketing hype.

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-09 03:47

Continuous auctions sound nice in theory, but when it comes to actual trading, it all depends on trading volume. Is retail participation fair? Ha, it looks like just another new trick to harvest the little guys. The price at 5.71 is a bit fragile; if 5.3 can't hold, I'll admit defeat.

View OriginalReply0