Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
A recent new project called APRZ has been making quite a buzz in the market, claiming to have established linkage collaborations with nine major cryptocurrencies including BTC, ETH, and SOL. During the pre-sale phase, it potentially offers a 26,500% return on investment. At first glance, this number is almost dizzying—invest 100 dollars and theoretically earn 2.65 million. But is it really that good?
Let's first look at the broader market context. Recently, the cryptocurrency market has indeed been warming up, and many investors are starting to look for the so-called "next potential coin." Under this mindset, various new projects are emerging endlessly, and promises of ultra-high returns like APRZ's are like a huge magnet pulling in investors.
When carefully examining APRZ's information, problems begin to surface. Basic historical data on the project is almost impossible to find, the team’s background is vague, and there is no official version of the white paper. These are fundamental transparency requirements for new projects, yet they are all missing. Even the claim of "linkage with 9 major mainstream coins" is unclear—how exactly is the linkage established, what is the depth of cooperation, and are there formal agreements? It’s all unclear.
From market experience, the real stories behind such ultra-high return projects are often quite tragic—90% of the time, they end up as worthless tokens. The most common tactic is: attract retail investors with low prices early on, then project teams and early investors escape while others are left holding the bag. Countless projects like this have appeared in history, and every time, many investors lose everything.
Imagination can be very rich, but risk assessment must be rational. Chasing after new projects is not inherently wrong, but the key is to understand what you are gambling on. If a project lacks verifiable fundamentals, a clear profit model, and the team’s information is unclear, then even the highest promised returns are castles in the air. Missing out on opportunities may be disappointing for a while, but a liquidation event could change your life. Unless you truly have inside information, following the crowd usually leads to poor results.