#美国贸易赤字状况 Recently, a major move has attracted the attention of the financial world— a top national leader has ordered a direct repurchase of $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS), which is quite interesting.



In simple terms, the government bypasses the central bank and uses its own funds to buy MBS. It sounds like QE, but it's not exactly the same—it's more like an "administrative targeted strike." The goal is straightforward: to lower mortgage rates and ease the borrowing pressure on the public.

How is it done? Government-supported agencies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac step in, directly purchasing MBS from the market. As a result, demand for MBS increases, prices rise, and yields decline. Consequently, stocks related to home loans also surge. The market interprets this as a clear signal of government support for the housing market.

From a supportive perspective, this move is indeed effective—it can release liquidity and give a boost to the mortgage market without changing the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy. Lenders and prospective homebuyers can breathe a sigh of relief in the short term.

However, there are also many objections. Some point out that this is merely a band-aid—housing supply is fundamentally insufficient, and lowering interest rates may stimulate more people to buy homes, potentially causing housing prices to soar even higher. Moreover, the government’s direct intervention in market pricing mechanisms may not be healthy in the long run.

The key question is: can this truly solve the problem? If housing supply continues to lag behind, even lower interest rates might exacerbate the upward pressure on prices. Additionally, this move has pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the spotlight, and with an election year approaching, it inevitably raises concerns about political motives.

Overall, this is a targeted financial policy experiment. The short-term market response is quite positive, but the long-term effects depend on whether housing supply can keep up and whether market structures can be improved. It’s worth paying attention to the subsequent trends in housing prices and liquidity changes.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenEconomistvip
· 15h ago
actually, let me break this down—they're essentially doing off-chain liquidity injection dressed up as mbs buying, which is lowkey just qe with extra steps ngl
Reply0
MoonMathMagicvip
· 15h ago
Another form of QE, but this time more straightforward, bypassing the central bank to intervene directly. Housing prices still need to rise. Honestly, this is just political maneuvering during an election year—short-term firefighting with long-term landmines. The deadlock caused by insufficient supply cannot be broken, no matter how low the interest rates are; it only leads to more competition. It's somewhat interesting—government directly targeting the market, with the central bank in a bit of an awkward position. If this operation really works, it would be unbelievable; fundamentally, there isn't enough housing. Spending $200 billion, but in the end, landlords still profit, and the middle class continues to be squeezed.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglassesvip
· 15h ago
Another 200 billion for the housing market, basically prioritizing votes.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)