2026-01-09 04:22:41

What kind of trading volume would the community need to hit before getting project endorsement or splitting the protocol fees? This seems like a key milestone worth tracking.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeAuditQueen

· 11h ago

This question is a bit naive... Do you really think that increasing trading volume will automatically lead to fee sharing? First, check if there are any hidden pitfalls in the contract, and then see if this incentive mechanism has any reentrancy attack vulnerabilities.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 01-09 17:20

This milestone depends on how the project team sets it. It feels a bit vague... We need a specific number to proceed.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterLucky

· 01-09 04:52

It depends on how the team sets the targets, I feel like no one really has a clear answer...

View OriginalReply0

Whale_Whisperer

· 01-09 04:50

How big does the scale need to be to get endorsement? Can these numbers be made more transparent? I always feel the standards are vague.

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 01-09 04:46

Wait, what exactly is the critical number? Isn't anyone clear about it…

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 01-09 04:36

The key is to first increase the trading volume, otherwise it's all pointless.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 01-09 04:31

Really, what should this number be to count? Is it at the million level or does it need to break 100 million to receive dividends? It feels like this threshold needs to be thoroughly understood.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 01-09 04:25

ngl this is the real question nobody wants to ask... like what's the actual number that triggers the flip? 👀 seen too many projects move goalposts when volume actually pops off tbh

Reply0