2026-01-09 04:24:23

GUN's recent trend is quite interesting—trading volume plummeted nearly 98% within 24 hours, yet the price surged by over 15%, a typical shrinking volume rally. This situation looks a bit suspicious.

Why do I say that? A rise on low volume is often a warning sign. If the sustained buying momentum can't keep up, the price is likely to fall back to the level where trading volume accumulated, which is the real support.

From a trading perspective, there are indeed opportunities for shorting here. Set two take-profit points: 0.0210 as the first target, and 0.0200 as the second. As for stop-loss, it depends on the 4-hour closing price; if it breaks above 0.0260, it's time to cut losses and exit.

In simple terms, a volume-shrinking rally is just building up for the next adjustment, so caution is especially important at this time.

GUN-2.87%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller69

· 01-09 04:54

The pattern of shrinking volume and pushing up is something I've seen many times before; it's mostly a bear trap, don't be fooled. How does it feel like GUN is just playing tricks this time? With such weak trading volume yet still rising, it might actually be a contrarian indicator. Rising on low volume? Isn't this just handing a knife to the bears, waiting to be counterattacked? Taking profit at 0.0210? That's too conservative. These kind of manipulative stocks often surprise you. Shrinking volume markets are the hardest to judge. I choose to wait and see, not playing these false moves.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaximalist

· 01-09 04:50

ngl, low volume pumps are just exit liquidity for smart money... seen this pattern play out a thousand times across adoption curves. gun's about to face some real protocol stress tests if retail doesn't back this rally.

Reply0

MetadataExplorer

· 01-09 04:49

A sudden surge on low volume is really a trap. It looks like a strong increase, but with such weak trading volume, it feels like it could crash down at any moment.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-09 04:38

The pattern of volume contraction and price manipulation I've seen too many times; 99% of the time it's just a trap to lure more buyers, don't be fooled --- A rise on low volume? Haha, that's a clear warning sign of a trap, a decline is just around the corner --- GUN's recent moves are definitely a bit shady, where did all the trading volume go? --- Once again, this pattern of rising on low volume, I choose to run and wait and see --- The levels at 0.0210 and 0.0200 sound good, but I still trust the volume to speak --- Is this a shorting opportunity? I think it's more like a chance for bagholders --- This kind of market is the easiest to cut the leeks, the risk is definitely waiting behind --- No matter how fierce the rise, a price increase without volume is fake, it will come back sooner or later --- I'm temporarily observing GUN for now, waiting for the volume and momentum to pick up before acting --- I think a stop loss at 0.0260 is still too tight, this thing is easily swept away

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractRebel

· 01-09 04:30

Shrinking volume surge? Isn't this just the smell of a trap? 98% of the volume evaporated directly, which is indeed a bit fierce. A typical night before a dump, waiting to retest 0.0200 to watch the show. The rise with no volume is the most虚, this wave is either the market maker testing the waters or about to cut the leeks. Stop loss at 0.0260 is a bit loose, I’d rather not trade in this kind of market. Shrinking volume but the increase exceeds 15%? I just want to ask who is taking the buy-in. After breaking 0.0210, it might really be unbearable, the short position time is up. This is a典型的V型陷阱, you need to be more cautious. No-volume price increase = false rise, it breaks at a touch.

View OriginalReply0