2026-01-09 04:30:53

Recently, in several popular coin competitions, cost control and loss rates have become key factors.

$STAR entered at 61,000, with a safe entry estimate around 66,000, and the fluctuation range is not large, making it relatively stable overall. In comparison, $KGEN's situation is more common—most participants' costs fall within the 13,000 range, in other words, about 15 US dollars more than usual to refresh data.

The most interesting is $TIMI, priced at over 20 US dollars, and with three or four days left until the end of the event, competition has already started to intensify. This is also currently the only remaining contest project. Based on historical comparisons, the competition intensity this round may be even more fierce than the last. If the loss efficiency cannot reach 2%, it is still recommended to observe for now and not to push hard.

KGEN1.38%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OptionWhisperer

· 13h ago

TIMI's internal competition speed is really outrageous, starting to compete in just three or four days? Never mind, I'll wait and see, I definitely can't achieve the 2x efficiency. STAR's fluctuation space is indeed not large, it feels like there's not much room for operation. KGEN's cost of 15u this round is a bit painful, it doesn't seem very cost-effective. Is TIMI's competitive intensity even stronger than last time? Then I need to observe a bit more, rushing blindly is too risky. STAR is stable, but the profit potential is limited. It seems that the loss rate in this round of the market is really the killer. TIMI, at just over 20u, has become so competitive, can it still be played later?

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-09 05:01

TIMI's internal competition speed is really outrageous; it's only been three or four days and it's already heating up. Not everyone can afford a 2% loss. STAR is stable, but the small fluctuation range is a bit dull. Think carefully before jumping into KGEN's 15u cost; it's not worth it. It seems there's really no way to find an edge in this round of competition.

View OriginalReply0

DuckFluff

· 01-09 05:00

Star this round looks okay, but the loss on KGEN is a bit high. The cost of 15u is not too much or too little to say. Timi's internal competition started so early? It began in three or four days. Feels even more intense than last time. A 2x efficiency is really a hurdle. If I can't reach it, I'll just stay put. I don't want to be cut too harshly.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-09 04:59

TIMI's internal competition level is really intense, it's not even over yet and we're already competing against each other haha STAR is stable, but with such a small fluctuation range, it's not really meaningful KGEN's cost of over 30,000 is a bit painful, I wish I had waited a bit longer For TIMI below 20,000, there's no point wasting effort, it's really not worth it STAR is still the safest option, the others require risking everything This round of competition is much fiercer than last time, it feels like everyone is about to burn out The cost of that 15u for KGEN, I think it's not very cost-effective If TIMI can't control the loss efficiency well, it's better to stay calm and watch Among the three projects, STAR is actually the easiest to manage If this competition continues, it feels like no one will make money, and instead everyone will be working for the project owners

View OriginalReply0

OnlyOnMainnet

· 01-09 04:38

STAR's current stability is a bit boring, while KGEN has made things quite chaotic. Why should I pay an extra 15k? TIMI is heating up. I advise everyone not to rush in blindly. If your efficiency isn't around 2x, better to wait and see. KGEN's cost at 30k is a bit outrageous. It feels like everyone got exploited for a round. TIMI will start internal competition in three or four days? The competition intensity is indeed fierce, but I don't think it's worth it. The fluctuation range of 6.1 to 6.6 for STAR is too narrow, it's a bit unsettling. The price of over 20k for TIMI has become so volatile, it shows that participants have gone crazy. KGEN's broad appeal definitely attracts people, most of them got caught in the crossfire. I choose to pass on TIMI, wait for the next round. Finally, STAR has a stable option, which is better than being exploited. TIMI's activity hasn't even ended before internal competition starts. I don't really like this atmosphere.

View OriginalReply0

fomo_fighter

· 01-09 04:37

Wow, TIMI is only a few days in and it's already getting competitive, that's impressive.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 01-09 04:31

TIMI this round of competition is really outrageous, just three or four days and it's like this, it's hard to even maintain 2万 --- STAR is okay, steady at 6.1 to 6.6, at least there is data support, not just gambling --- KGEN paying an extra 15u to refresh what, feels a bit unfair --- Tsk, is the competition even fiercer than last time? Then I’d better wait and see --- No, if you can't even reach 2万 efficiency, then what's the point of forcing it --- The TIMI competition kings really leave no room for others, the price is only a bit over 20u --- It seems this round of competition isn't as friendly as expected --- Need to do some precise calculations, or it's just burning gas for nothing --- The entry point for STAR is still okay, but the space is a bit too narrow --- The cost structure at 30,000 is a bit harsh, who wants to spend this unnecessary money

View OriginalReply0