2026-01-09 10:29:07

The latest move by the South Korean government is worth a serious look for industry insiders.

In the "2026 Economic Growth Strategy," the Korean authorities explicitly propose to use digital currencies to distribute treasury subsidies and other fiscal funds, setting a goal — by 2030, at least 25% of treasury funds will be digitally disbursed. This is not a simple technical test but an institutional arrangement incorporated into medium- and long-term development plans.

What does this decision imply?

**First signal: Blockchain has entered the core level of fiscal decision-making**

Treasury funds have always represented the strictest standards — prioritizing security, compliance, and controllability. The Korean government daring to put subsidies on the chain essentially indicates that the transparency, traceability, and execution efficiency of blockchain have reached an officially recognized level. This is not just theoretical approval but actual action.

**Second signal: The imagination space for digital currencies is changing**

In the past, many people equated coins with speculation. But in practical operations, governments use them for transfers and disbursements, regulators use them to track fund flows, and enterprises use them to reduce costs and prevent corruption. These are hard needs, and once started, it’s difficult to stop.

**Actual market impact**

The favorable directions are clear: stablecoins, public blockchains, on-chain payments, and settlements will accelerate their real-world applications. South Korea’s move may also set an example for other countries, encouraging more policy recognition.

However, a risk point to watch is that government-led digital currency systems will emphasize controllability and traceability more. This means projects with strong anonymity or fully decentralized routes might face restrictions. Simply put, this favors technologies and assets with real application scenarios but may not benefit all "wild projects."

**Core judgment**

This is not short-term market news but a directional change. When a country begins to use digital currencies for treasury affairs, it indicates that blockchain has evolved from a peripheral financial tool into infrastructure-level technology.

In the short term, hype will gradually fade, and bubbles will burst. But in the long run, those public chains and applications with real utility will only become more important. The future winners are not those who shout the loudest but those truly adopted by governments, enterprises, and ordinary users.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TommyTeacher1

· 01-09 10:58

We really have to see this wave; Korea's move is not simple. --- Central bank digital currency? That's outrageous; it should have been like this a long time ago. --- Wait, does this mean the days of anonymous coins are over... --- Exactly, only truly useful things can survive. --- Korea has taken the lead again, what about us? --- Transfer efficiency is indeed an inherent advantage of blockchain. --- The question is whether we can avoid so much tracking and whether transparency is necessary. --- Haha, unorthodox projects should go bankrupt. --- It looks like this time it's not just hype but genuine infrastructure development. --- Stablecoins now have prospects, but it also means tighter regulation.

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekMaster

· 01-09 10:55

Now someone is finally serious about playing, not just talk. Is the spring of stablecoins and public chains here? Government approval is a huge positive news. Speaking of anonymous coins, this wave is going to suffer. Korea's move directly shuts down the imagination space for decentralization. Being used is the true way; the era of hype is really over. Wait, treasury funds are now on the blockchain. Will other countries follow suit? This is the long-term point of interest.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerForever

· 01-09 10:55

South Korea's move is indeed aggressive. What does on-chain treasury funding mean... Is the infrastructure era coming? --- Ah, once again "government approval," but is this really genuine or are they just trying to trap us again? --- Stablecoins and public chains are set to take off, but the days for anonymous coins might be even harder. --- Basically, only projects with real use cases can survive; air projects will eventually fade away. --- The country is starting to use it to manage the treasury... This is more solid than any other good news; in the long run, it’s truly different. --- Every time they talk about infrastructure, it still boils down to controllability; I’m starting to get tired of these buzzwords. --- By 2030, 25% of the treasury will be digitalized. It feels like the real watershed moment. --- Wait, does this mean the government will track every transaction? Privacy projects really have no future. --- Decentralized projects are being squeezed out, and some of my holdings seem to need a little education.

View OriginalReply0

SelfMadeRuggee

· 01-09 10:54

Another new reason to cut leeks? This time it's the Korean government backing it? Real application implementation should have started long ago. Why are we only talking about this now? Using digital currency by the government ≠ price increase. Don't confuse the two. Controllable and traceable... that is CBDC, which is fundamentally different from what we play with. Anonymous coins are directly eliminated, that's a fact. Only truly foundational infrastructure can survive in the end; others will eventually become worthless. Just listen, don't take it as real operation.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-09 10:51

South Korea's move is indeed aggressive; putting the national treasury on the blockchain is no joke. Finally, some government officials are being responsible. On-chain subsidies are equivalent to official stamp of approval. Now those hype-only projects should be panicking; only projects with real use cases can survive. Long-term optimism remains, but short-term speculation should cool down. National-level applications are being implemented, which is the real indicator of the trend.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 01-09 10:37

South Korea's move is quite aggressive; they've dared to put the national treasury on the blockchain, which shows there's no turning back --- Wait, isn't this saying that stablecoins are the real demand? What about anonymous coins... --- Finally, someone has made it clear: not all coins will survive to see that day --- Once the government starts using it, they can't stop; I respect this logic --- Decentralized projects should be nervous, but then again, who really cares about that --- Long-term focus on applications, short-term on market trends—it's a cliché, but it's true --- National-level recognition and grassroots hype are completely different; need to distinguish clearly --- Are those loudly shouting projects starting to become worthless? --- Only assets that can actually be used are truly valuable; others are just gambling chips

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 01-09 10:36

Haha, the national-level finance is on the chain now, so it's not just talk in the white paper. I've experienced the 2018 wave before, and now seeing the government putting real money on the chain feels different. But don't rush into a daze; that bunch of anonymous coins will be shut down sooner or later, that's inevitable. The retail investors are still gambling on wild schemes, haha.

View OriginalReply0