2026-01-09 10:30:14

Looking at StandX's performance over the past year, saying it is still an "early-stage project" is no longer quite accurate. The most noteworthy aspect is that it hasn't boosted popularity through emotional marketing; instead, it has earned trust through continuous updates of data metrics—this approach is indeed rare among project teams.

I started to seriously study StandX, with its stablecoin DUSD as the entry point. Here's an interesting comparison: many stablecoin projects in the industry are burning money on subsidies to pile up TVL, but DUSD is taking a different path. Its revenue model is designed to be quite solid, not relying on temporary incentives to barely sustain, but generating sustainable income through the mechanism itself.

This difference may seem like a detail, but it actually reflects the project's maturity. Being able to speak with data and mechanisms is more convincing than just shouting slogans. From this perspective, StandX has indeed moved out of the pure "early exploration" stage.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldWhisperer

· 01-09 10:59

Hey, that's not right. Projects that rely on mechanisms to sustain themselves are indeed rare; most are just burning money to pile up data.

View OriginalReply0

ChainChef

· 01-09 10:39

ngl, this is the kind of recipe most projects can't even read... dusd's actually simmering properly instead of just dumping subsidy seasoning everywhere. respect the methodology.

Reply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 01-09 10:36

Data doesn't lie, and I agree with that. Compared to those projects that promote themselves with empty hype every day, StandX's approach is indeed eye-catching. Haven't we seen enough schemes that burn money to pile up TVL? The self-consistent mechanism design of DUSD is worth following up on. Generating revenue from the mechanism itself vs. subsidies to sustain life, the difference is quite significant. I'm not hyping or criticizing; the data is right here, and it's a matter of attitude. This low-key but solid style actually makes people more interested in studying it.

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 01-09 10:35

Reliable projects are like this: making big money quietly without the need for daily hype. The mechanism design of DUSD truly impressed me. Not many stablecoins can run without burning money. Finally, there is a project that focuses on doing things seriously instead of just marketing, and it feels good. Data doesn't lie; I only look at this. To be honest, compared to those daily airdrops, this style is much more pleasing. Actually, making a product is much more difficult than doing publicity. StandX has realized this. A sound mechanism is a hundred times more important than a handsome fundraising amount, and that's the truth. No hype, no blackening; just want to see how far DUSD can go.

View OriginalReply0