2026-01-09 10:30:58

Have you ever wondered where current Web3 games are "not quite Web3" enough?

Honestly, many so-called Web3 games are like this: game items are minted as NFTs, which sounds very blockchain. But these NFTs are just certificates—real 3D models, stunning effects, complex logic—all still stored on a centralized server of some company. Once the server is shut down, your so-called "legendary gear" becomes a dead icon, completely useless.

Now, something is changing this situation, called the Walrus Protocol. Its core concept is programmable data storage—that is, making game assets truly "live" on the chain.

For example, you defeat a sword called "Flame Dragon's Fury" in a blockchain open-world RPG. How would traditional game companies handle this? The sword's 3D model, flame particle effects when swung, sound effects—all are locked on their servers. But a game built with Walrus is different—the complete high-precision model of the sword, every frame of special effects, even audio files, are directly stored on the Walrus network. It’s not a link that might 404; it’s the actual on-chain asset itself. Your weapon is truly alive.

Even more amazing is the upgrade system. You find a blacksmith and spend upgrade materials to enhance the sword. This action triggers a smart contract, which does two things:

First, it verifies your wallet—confirming you actually have enough upgrade materials (which are also on-chain assets). After passing the check, the contract gets authorized to directly write new data into the "Flame Dragon's Fury" asset file stored on Walrus. It adds a frost effect to the blade, changing its attack power from "+15" to "+25". The entire upgrade process is like your "weapon enchanter"—a smart contract.

What are the benefits of doing this? Your equipment no longer depends on any centralized service to stay alive. Rules are determined by code, and the rewriting permissions are completely transparent. A fully decentralized game world where players truly own their assets is no longer just a concept but a real possibility.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlyingLeek

· 01-09 11:00

Talking big, but I'm just worried it will turn out to be the next "revolutionary" project, and when you actually start playing, you'll find it's still the same old gameplay.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-09 10:57

Wait, can Walrus really write game assets onto the chain? Sounds a bit dubious. --- Once again, a bunch of promised technology. I've heard this too many times before. --- The Flame Dragon's Fury sword lives on the chain... and then? Things on the chain can still be hacked. --- Honestly, there are still so many games stuck on centralized servers. Can Walrus change this situation? I’m not so sure. --- Contracts are like enchanters. I love this analogy. --- Programmable storage is indeed interesting, but what about the cost? No one mentions the cost. --- I've been hearing about decentralized game worlds for years. Why haven't they been implemented yet? --- Finally, someone dares to say that many Web3 games are just scams in disguise. --- Walrus protocol sounds good, but do players really care? Or are they only interested in making money?

View OriginalReply0

0xSoulless

· 01-09 10:54

Another new concept to harvest retail investors, Walrus Protocol sounds quite impressive. Let's wait and see which wave of capital will step in to take over.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 01-09 10:46

Wait, can Walrus really run? It sounds like moving the entire game asset library onto the chain, the server costs must be exploding. --- The Flame Dragon's Fury sword stored on Walrus, are you really not afraid of network latency causing freezes? I've seen too many chain games like this. --- Sounds nice, but in the end it still depends on whether the project team is willing to truly decentralize. Transparent code ≠ truly transparent power. --- Finally someone is complaining about this issue. 99% of Web3 games are just re-skinned NFT scams. --- If this can be truly realized, it would be OP, but it still feels like in the early exploratory stage.

View OriginalReply0