The recent rebound of Bitcoin has caught my attention. Actually, my first reaction wasn't "Should I buy in?" but rather a sudden focus on carefully screening AI projects.
The reason is simple: AI education in 2025 was a harsh lesson. Models are becoming more powerful, but the more powerful they get, the more it feels like they are "spectating" you. Do you talk about a sense of participation? Profit rights? Governance rights? They are basically nonexistent.
So I’ve been waiting for a different kind of AI narrative—not "I give you access," but "you are part of the network." I noticed @DeepNodeAI.
What moved me isn't just the loud slogans, but the logic itself is very "anti-giant." DeepNodeAI's approach is actually very simple: Disassemble, decentralize, and return the core elements—models, computing power, and data—to the community.
You're not contributing for nothing. Sharing models means you get rewards when they are used; If you have idle computing power, it’s not about mining competition but participating in real training; Having compliant data isn’t about free riding but direct pricing incentives.
Most importantly—rules are open, and accounts are transparent.
It’s not a project where "the foundation calls the shots." There is a foundation, but no centralization; There is an organization, but no monopoly; parameters, mechanisms, governance paths—all laid out openly, allowing the community to invest, modify, or veto.
And it’s no longer just "pie-in-the-sky" dreaming.
Reaching this stage shows that the product, ecosystem, and integrations are all operational—not just PPT-level presentations.
Personally, I pay more attention to $DN ’s role design—it’s not just a coin for speculation.
You can stake it to earn real network income; Contribute value and receive long-term incentives; If you want to access more advanced AI capabilities, use $DN to unlock them; If you want to decide the network’s direction, participate directly in governance voting.
Profit rights + usage rights + decision-making rights are all linked together.
Honestly, such a design is rare among current AI projects.
If AI really enters the "infrastructure competition" in 2026, I’d prefer to bet on this kind of system: Not making money solely through monopolizing models, but through network growth dividends.
Hope $DN can step up, and truly let us participate in "the piece of meat" that participants deserve to eat.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The recent rebound of Bitcoin has caught my attention. Actually, my first reaction wasn't "Should I buy in?" but rather a sudden focus on carefully screening AI projects.
The reason is simple: AI education in 2025 was a harsh lesson. Models are becoming more powerful, but the more powerful they get, the more it feels like they are "spectating" you. Do you talk about a sense of participation? Profit rights? Governance rights?
They are basically nonexistent.
So I’ve been waiting for a different kind of AI narrative—not "I give you access," but "you are part of the network." I noticed @DeepNodeAI.
What moved me isn't just the loud slogans, but the logic itself is very "anti-giant."
DeepNodeAI's approach is actually very simple:
Disassemble, decentralize, and return the core elements—models, computing power, and data—to the community.
You're not contributing for nothing.
Sharing models means you get rewards when they are used;
If you have idle computing power, it’s not about mining competition but participating in real training;
Having compliant data isn’t about free riding but direct pricing incentives.
Most importantly—rules are open, and accounts are transparent.
It’s not a project where "the foundation calls the shots." There is a foundation, but no centralization;
There is an organization, but no monopoly; parameters, mechanisms, governance paths—all laid out openly, allowing the community to invest, modify, or veto.
And it’s no longer just "pie-in-the-sky" dreaming.
$DN ’s TGE is happening today: January 9th.
Reaching this stage shows that the product, ecosystem, and integrations are all operational—not just PPT-level presentations.
Personally, I pay more attention to $DN ’s role design—it’s not just a coin for speculation.
You can stake it to earn real network income;
Contribute value and receive long-term incentives;
If you want to access more advanced AI capabilities, use $DN to unlock them;
If you want to decide the network’s direction, participate directly in governance voting.
Profit rights + usage rights + decision-making rights are all linked together.
Honestly, such a design is rare among current AI projects.
If AI really enters the "infrastructure competition" in 2026, I’d prefer to bet on this kind of system:
Not making money solely through monopolizing models, but through network growth dividends.
Hope $DN can step up,
and truly let us participate in "the piece of meat" that participants deserve to eat.