We're entering an era where every AI computation needs cryptographic verification. The old centralized model is breaking down. What's replacing it? A distributed network that makes AI computation verifiable and trustless by design. Imagine this: instead of relying on a single company's servers, inference tasks get processed across a global mesh of independent nodes. Each computation produces cryptographic proof. No black box. No centralized chokepoint. This is what trustless AGI infrastructure actually looks like—transparent, auditable, and genuinely decentralized. It's not just theory anymore. We're building the engine that makes this possible.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
governance_lurkervip
· 01-09 11:50
It sounds grand, but how many projects can really get off the ground? --- Cryptographic verification for every calculation? Won't the costs explode? --- Decentralized AGI, another concept that sounds impressive but is still far off. --- The black box problem is indeed annoying, but how do we calculate the latency and costs of distributed nodes? --- At first glance, this logic seems fine, but the key question is who will maintain this network? --- Again, it's trustless trustless, but in the end, isn't it just trusting the code? --- It's quite hyped, but let's wait until there are actual products. --- Verifiable AI is indeed needed, but the infrastructure is not mature enough yet. --- Why would centralized systems collapse? Users just want speed. --- Cryptographic proofs sound very sexy, but what about performance metrics?
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHerevip
· 01-09 11:48
Uh... sounds good, but can this thing really run? Distributed verification sounds great, but actual deployment is another matter. Another "we are building," I'm getting tired of hearing that phrase. Should we wait until it’s actually implemented before bragging? Who will bear the cost of cryptographic verification?
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawervip
· 01-09 11:47
Cryptographic verification for each calculation sounds ideal, but can it actually be implemented? We've been waiting too long for truly decentralized AGI. Feels like another hype cycle; let's see if there's any real implementation. Node verification sounds good, but I'm worried about efficiency issues, brother. Can this distributed solution really be faster than OpenAI? That's uncertain. The dream of decentralization still comes down to fundamentals—can it beat costs and speed? It feels like dreaming about infrastructure, but what if the dream comes true? The black box problem is really annoying. If it can be verified, that's a huge win.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMastervip
· 01-09 11:44
Bro, this set of logic sounds great, but can it really be implemented? Cryptographic verification for every calculation? Who will bear the cost? The decentralization dream clashes with reality, and it's just the old p2p tune. How to ensure node honesty? How to design tokenomics so it doesn't become a tool for cutting leeks? That's the key. No matter what, someone has to use it. Will big companies obediently migrate? Just listen for now. It's not too late to boast once there are real products.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrainvip
· 01-09 11:34
Sounds very sexy, but can it really be implemented? Or is it just another round of hype around worthless tokens?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)