Recently, the positive developments in the ecosystem of a leading DEX have been continuously emerging. Many people are still hesitant about whether to get involved, but there's really no need to rush. These good news at this stage are just a phase of quantitative change; true qualitative change may still require time to accumulate.



If you truly understand the basic logic of this project, you can consider deploying gradually and accumulating steadily. Our focus should be on the 5 to 10-year outlook, not short-term price fluctuations.

So the question is: how to determine if a coin is worth holding long-term? My suggestion is to analyze from three dimensions:

**First, does it have a unique ecosystem positioning?** In the entire Web3 landscape, what role does this project occupy, and how many competitors does it have?

**Second, is the team reliable?** Do the management have a big-picture view, and how trustworthy are they? This directly affects the project's long-term trajectory.

**Third, is the current price cheap?** Compared to its long-term value, does the current position have a safety margin?

If all three conditions are met, you can start building your position gradually. Just like accumulating gold, small amounts over time will give you the answer. Good projects + low prices + patience in holding = ideal returns.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-ccc36bc5vip
· 3h ago
That's true, but the key is whether the team is actually working on it, rather than just making empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-09 11:51
Nice words, but isn't it just to get us to take over the position and wait for them to cash out?
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFearvip
· 01-09 11:51
Accumulating in batches is indeed the right approach, but among these three conditions, the hardest part is still judging whether the team is reliable or not. Surface data can be deceptive.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidatorvip
· 01-09 11:51
Quantitative to qualitative change? It looks like they're just promising retail investors a pie in the sky. The three dimensions sound nice, but how many can truly quantify risk control thresholds? When the health factor drops below 0.8, even the best ecological positioning is just empty talk. When the lending ratio skyrockets, these long-term logic factors become the fuse for a chain reaction of liquidations.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 01-09 11:48
Sounds good, but I want to know if this DEX team is really working or just telling stories. Honestly, how long can this round of positive news last? It feels like just expectations. 5 to 10 years is too long; I'm more concerned about the trend next year.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 01-09 11:23
Haha, once again "Time will give you the answer," but my time has only given me losses... However, this three-dimensional approach really hits the mark—it's just that every time I choose "seems unique, sounds reliable, and is quite cheap" zero-sum coins.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkievip
· 01-09 11:21
Stockpiling this set is indeed reliable, but the real issue is that few people understand the logic. It's the team's turn again; are there still teams in history that have failed? It's okay to deploy in batches, but I'm just worried that after dividing, there will still be more divisions.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)