When it comes to prediction markets, Polymarket is one of the most well-known platforms. Many people have heard of its core rule—YES + NO = 1, but few truly understand this formula. Today, let's thoroughly explain this mechanism.



Many friends might ask: Why must it be 1? If the YES price is 0.7 and the NO price is 0.6, totaling 1.3, can't we just set prices freely?

Wrong. Although it's a free market, the logic here is completely different. YES and NO are not like two stocks that can fluctuate independently; they are essentially the same value torn into two halves.

How to understand this? Imagine that what Polymarket sells is not lottery tickets or futures, but future redemption vouchers. Each voucher's value is always anchored at 1 USD. The market simply divides this 1 USD into two parts, one labeled YES and the other NO.

What happens at the settlement date? If the predicted event occurs, the YES voucher is worth 1 USD, and the NO voucher becomes 0. Conversely, if the event does not occur, the YES voucher becomes zero, and the NO voucher is worth 1 USD.

Therefore, the math at settlement always holds:
- Event occurs: 1 + 0 = 1
- Event does not occur: 0 + 1 = 1

This is the brilliance of the shared order book—under the same market and settlement conditions, the prices of complementary outcomes are always bound by this 1 USD constraint. No arbitrage space exists, and the logic is self-consistent.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HappyToBeDumpedvip
· 8h ago
Haha, finally someone explained this clearly. I really didn't understand before why it must equal 1.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelorvip
· 01-09 12:27
Wow, someone finally explained this logic thoroughly. I was really fooled by the false logic of 0.7+0.6=1.3 before, but now I understand that it's basically a game of splitting everything equally in half.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 01-09 12:14
ngl this YES + NO = 1 thing finally clicked for me... basically they're not two separate assets, they're literally two halves of the same dollar. no arbitrage space means no free lunch, which honestly should've been obvious but here we are lmao
Reply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 01-09 11:54
Basically, it's a zero-sum game: when one rises, the other must fall. That's the true essence of market prediction.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 01-09 11:53
Wow, someone finally explained this thoroughly. I was really stuck on this 1 before.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 01-09 11:53
Good morning, it's me at 3 a.m.—let me say a few words—this design is actually just to block all arbitrage opportunities. No arbitrage space means no freedom. It’s proudly called "logical self-consistency," but in plain terms, it’s just being choked by the rope of 1 dollar.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChainvip
· 01-09 11:51
Basically, it's a zero-sum game, and seasoned crypto enthusiasts all understand this.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 01-09 11:44
honestly the YES+NO=1 constraint is just elegant mechanism design, ngl... most people don't grasp that this isn't about "free pricing" at all, it's about enforcing binary outcome completeness. the shared order book architecture basically eliminates arbitrage by design—that's the whole point. not rocket science but yeah, most newcomers trip over this.
Reply0
PessimisticOraclevip
· 01-09 11:30
Oh, so that's why no one can exploit the system; the structure is perfect.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt