Zero-knowledge proofs are called "cryptographic magic" for a reason—they are indeed the most explosive technology in the field of cryptography. But the real-world problem is that there is a huge gap, almost a chasm, between academic papers in the lab and products that can actually be used.



A team has been working on bridging this gap. Their approach is very clear—package those deep, complex ZKP technologies used in academia into tools that financial developers can directly use. What's the benefit of doing this? Unlocking commercial potential—that's currently the biggest gap in blockchain privacy.

Think about how uncomfortable it is to conduct financial activities on a transparent blockchain. Once a transaction strategy is on-chain, it’s monitored, and front-running risks skyrocket. Corporate tokenized assets and liability details are fully exposed, and every step of portfolio adjustments is watched by the entire network. For institutional investors, this is a nightmare—business risks and information disadvantages coexist.

The "Confidential Smart Contract" paradigm is designed to directly address these issues. What can it do?

First, confidential auctions and fundraising. Suppose a company wants to conduct a private placement or bond issuance on-chain. With this solution, it only needs to disclose terms to a qualified investor group verified through KYC/AML, and each investor’s bid remains hidden from others. This creates a more genuine price discovery mechanism. All parties’ business intentions are protected, and no one can arbitrage from others’ bidding actions.

Next, confidential trading and dark pools. For large asset swaps or trades, transaction details, specific quantities, and transaction prices are completely black-boxed before settlement. Market impact disappears, and the risk of information leakage is eliminated. This is a real necessity for institutional investors.

In simple terms, privacy is not about avoiding regulation, but about enabling on-chain finance to truly support institutional-grade applications. Currently, unless the transparency of the chain can solve privacy issues, it’s hard to attract serious financial players.
ZKP-6.29%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 01-09 11:55
This wave is indeed an opportunity, but it depends on who can cross this chasm first... Only when the privacy infrastructure is well established can institutions truly enter the market. From research papers to real-world implementation, the cycle for ZKP has been too long. However, now some are starting to fill the gaps, indicating that the market is self-healing. Transparent chains for finance? That's just asking for trouble. Enterprises and institutions have long been waiting for such solutions. Conservation of energy, everyone. Privacy is not about doing evil; it's about making the rules of the game fairer. Many people haven't fully understood this yet.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtistvip
· 01-09 11:51
Alright, ZK stuff is indeed impressive, but toolification is the key.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFanvip
· 01-09 11:45
Well said. The gap from research papers to product deployment is indeed the most awkward. ZK technology is impressive, but it’s useless if it can’t be practically applied. The pain points for institutional investors are correctly identified. Playing finance transparently on the chain is truly like going naked. Privacy ≠ avoidance; this must be made clear, or else it will be morally hijacked again. I'm a bit concerned about dark pools... Can they really be completely black boxes, or is this just another round of hype?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChefvip
· 01-09 11:40
Ha, finally someone has explained this clearly. ZK has just been talk on paper for so many years. --- Institutional investors have long been disgusted by transparent chains. Now there are tools to save the day. --- The confidentiality auction part is indeed fair; no one can see your bids. Price discovery is what makes it real. --- Basically, the gap in privacy infrastructure is too big. It requires a team to take over and continue. --- This logic of dark pools, I feel like it's just repeating traditional finance? Can it really be implemented on-chain? --- Everyone knows the gap from ZKP from paper to product. The key is whether this toolkit can really be used, or if it's just a semi-finished product. --- Transparent chains can't attract institutions. That's not an exaggeration at all. If all business secrets are exposed, who would dare to play?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 01-09 11:39
Finally, someone is seriously filling this gap. The academic approach indeed needs to be transformed into something practical. Institutional players don't lack money; what they lack is privacy. Transparent chains for large transactions are basically naked. On-chain finance can only truly thrive if privacy is well implemented. Currently, this is indeed lacking. The ability to operate large transactions in a black box beforehand is a critical need; it can cut the risk of front-running trades in half. So, the key is whether the tools can actually be user-friendly. Otherwise, it will just be a bunch of research papers.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)