Want to make money with cryptocurrencies? Then you need to understand the market dynamics thoroughly. Honestly, retail investors are most vulnerable here.



Let's first look at WAL's recent performance. Based on the stability of the candlestick chart and trading volume, this is a project where the team is actively working on it. The price has rebounded from the lows of a couple of days ago to 0.15. Although the move isn't large, this steady upward momentum indicates one thing—someone is continuously operating.

Retail investors who haven't yet entered the top 100 coins in the crypto space fear what? They fear encountering unscrupulous whales or project teams that suddenly dump large sell-offs, causing sharp drops and triggering panic. Therefore, choosing a reliable team is really crucial.

The WALRUS project, although not backed by huge funds, at least isn't like some coins that dump immediately after launch and then abandon the project. What's most interesting is that these types of projects often take nearly a year of operation before they start to gain significant attention. This pace is quite rare in the crypto world. To put it simply, the team behind it isn't the type to lose interest after three minutes.

So, how about WAL itself? As a data storage protocol, its main function is storing large files—videos, images, AI training data, and so on. In the Web3 ecosystem and AI applications, it offers verifiability, ease of use, and affordability.

What are the key points?

First, the cost advantage is obvious. Web3 is currently a blooming landscape with fierce internal competition within the Sui ecosystem. WAL leverages Red Stuff's sharding technology, which provides a significant price advantage compared to traditional storage solutions and even early Web3 schemes. This isn't empty talk; it's real competitive strength built on solid technology.
WAL3.24%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiOrRektvip
· 01-09 12:57
The analysis of the chip surface is well explained, but I'm worried that most people are still just angry and recharging out of spite. WAL's recent performance indeed looks less impulsive and more stable, much better than some other coins. However, is the sharding technology of Red Stuff a bit overhyped? There's also quite a bit of competition in storage. Let's wait and see if the 0.15 level can hold.
View OriginalReply0
NullWhisperervip
· 01-09 12:57
honestly the whole "stable progression" narrative feels like cope when you're talking about a sub-100 coin... technically speaking, that 0.15 bounce could just be dead cat. need to dig into actual on-chain metrics before buying the "team is legit" story ngl
Reply0
LightningWalletvip
· 01-09 12:57
A price level of 0.15 is stable, indicating that there are indeed people operating, and I acknowledge that. But to be honest, small coins are just small coins; no matter how strong the technology is, it can't withstand the intentions of a big holder wanting to dump. Red Stuff sharding sounds good, but these days, who still believes in technical stories? Anyway, I'm just watching and waiting for the volume to pick up before making a move.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBrovip
· 01-09 12:54
Bro, this analysis does have some points, but to be honest, I need to see the trading volume at the 0.15 level before making any judgments.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailedvip
· 01-09 12:50
ngl, the "stable operation for a year" pitch is exactly what got me wrecked before. technically speaking, boring projects do sometimes moon, but i've learned this the hard way—patient teams can also just... exit quietly. red flags or not, show me the actual tx volume first.
Reply0
NFTDreamervip
· 01-09 12:46
0.15 has stabilized? This pace is indeed a bit impressive, unlike some coins that dump and run immediately. Taking over a year to make a statement shows at least there's no rush for quick profits, which is quite rare in the crypto world. The storage protocol is interesting, but I'm worried that later on, a bunch of follow-on projects might jump in. Red Stuff's sharding technology is indeed cheap, but being cheap doesn't necessarily mean someone will buy in—that's still a question. Anyway, with small coins like this, you have to bet on the team's integrity; there's no other way. If you pick wrong, you get washed out immediately. I'm watching, but I don't dare go all-in. Just playing around. Wait, is the competition in the Sui ecosystem so intense? Why haven't I paid much attention? Verifiable storage sounds good, but will users really be willing to pay for it?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 01-09 12:37
0.15 is indeed a stable position, but retail investors still need to be cautious. I need to look into the technical details of Red Stuff for WAL; just talking about cost advantages is too superficial. WALRUS only announced itself once a year; is this really genuine this time? Small coin projects have too many pitfalls; just looking at the K-line can't prevent big players from dumping. The storage protocol sector is highly competitive; what makes WAL capable of surviving until the end?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)