The arms race in storage costs is becoming increasingly intense in the crypto ecosystem.



Filecoin requires a 25x replication factor to ensure security, while Arweave stacks permanent storage with 100-1000x replication, directly pushing costs into astronomical numbers. Walrus protocol uses a clever approach—RedStuff 2D encoding technology—to reduce the replication factor to 4-5x, instantly boosting efficiency.

This encoding scheme is based on fountain codes. It sounds complex, but the core logic is simple: using XOR operations to shard data and store it across network nodes. The key advantage is strong fault tolerance—even if two-thirds of nodes fail simultaneously, the system can quickly reconstruct the original data. The security level can reach the "twelve nines" standard, which is top-tier in distributed storage.

Data comparison is more intuitive: storing 1TB of data for a year costs only $50, compared to Arweave's $3,500, a 98% reduction. Approaching the price level of centralized cloud services, what does this mean? On-chain storage has shifted from a "luxury" to a "commodity."

Behind Walrus is Mysten Labs, the team behind the Sui blockchain. They have deeply integrated Walrus into the Sui ecosystem, enabling stored data to have programmable capabilities. On-chain NFT metadata rights, smart contract and off-chain data interaction, storage of complex computation results—scenarios that were previously too costly—have suddenly become feasible.

The ecosystem token WAL plays three roles: staking, governance, and payments. Currently, 80TB of testnet storage data is already running, and the benefits of technical validation are gradually being realized. From the lab to the real network, this step is being taken very steadily.
FIL-0.46%
AR-1.54%
WAL-4.59%
SUI-0.87%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DOROvip
· 01-09 13:10
66666
Reply0
ILCollectorvip
· 01-09 12:57
Wow, a 98% drop? Is Arweave just pulling a rug pull?
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperervip
· 01-09 12:56
A 98% drop? If this really materializes, Arweave will be crying their eyes out. Permanent storage is finally becoming affordable.
View OriginalReply0
Beauwuvip
· 01-09 12:54
I think what you said is very good, at least in my opinion, very nice, I think it's right, very good, really great, awesome, keep it up. Let's improve together, impressive, keep going.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOopsvip
· 01-09 12:50
$50 a year, Arweave is being dragged along the ground... the cost difference is really incredible.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRidervip
· 01-09 12:47
Pushing to the extreme actually reveals optimization paths. Walrus's move truly impressed me.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-09 12:45
It's Sui again causing a stir; truly worthy of the mysterious school.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 01-09 12:34
So Arweave is digging its own grave, charging $3,500 for a 100x replication stack, it's really the most unfortunate of the unfortunate.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)