The most heartbreaking experience in a bull market is this: you’re optimistic about a certain coin (like BNB) breaking new highs, but your funds are already fully invested, and you can only watch it surge.



At this point, many people will go to the exchange to open a contract and add leverage to gamble. But I never do that—contract funding rates are a bottomless pit, and a slight mistake can lead to liquidation.

My approach is a "rolling leverage" mode using on-chain lending, making it feel like my bullets never run out.

**How does it work?**

Suppose you have 100 BNB. The first step is to deposit BNB into a lending protocol, collateralize it into tokens, and then borrow 50% of its value in USD1 stablecoins. The second step is to exchange the USD1 for 50 BNB spot. This way, you instantly control the price movement of 150 BNB. If you want to be more aggressive, you can continue looping—deposit the newly acquired 50 BNB, borrow again... but usually, a 1.5x leverage is enough.

**Why is this more comfortable than contracts?**

Exchange contracts require paying a funding fee of about 0.1% to 0.3% daily, which can eat up dozens of points over a year. In contrast, the on-chain lending mode has an annual interest rate of about 1%, making holding costs almost negligible.

The mindset is also completely different. As long as BNB isn’t cut in half directly, this position remains quite safe. Short-term fluctuations of 5% or 10% won’t scare anyone, and it won’t suddenly be liquidated like with contracts.

The returns are also quite interesting. If BNB rises from 600 to 900, a 50% increase, your 150 BNB will gain 75 points. The leverage effect is fully demonstrated.
BNB0.74%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 10h ago
This rolling position increase sounds good, but how many people can really stick to 1.5x? In the end, it's still easy to make mistakes.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 15h ago
nah, the circular logic here is sus tho... keep cycling collateral through defi and you're basically pyramid-stacking risk, just with prettier 1% apr numbers. one liquidation cascade and those "infinite bullets" go poof.
Reply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 01-09 13:01
Hmm, this idea is good. Borrowing and increasing positions is indeed much more moderate than contracts. Paying dozens of points annually in funding fees is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunnervip
· 01-09 13:01
Hey, this idea is indeed brilliant. Compared to the daily bleeding of contract funds, a lending interest rate of just 1% is really a drop in the bucket.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeakervip
· 01-09 13:00
Alright, this move is definitely much better than being drained by the contract every day. I'm just worried that lending interest rates will start to pick up again.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 01-09 12:45
Sounds good, but I still think it's just gambling with a different approach. As long as the volatility is large enough, no lending model can save you.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)