The turning point of the NFT market is approaching. If you want to select NFT assets in this cycle, how would you plan your layout? This not only tests your judgment of project fundamentals but also your grasp of market sentiment.



The key is to find projects with lasting vitality—not hype-driven trends, but ecosystems with genuine community accumulation and continuous iteration. Many people blindly chase high prices, but true winners often make calm choices at critical moments.

If you can only pick 3, consider these dimensions: first, the project's actual application scenarios and user stickiness; second, the founding team's ongoing investment and ecosystem layout; third, liquidity and risk tolerance in the secondary market.

At this moment, opportunities and risks coexist. Choosing correctly can seize the cycle's dividends; choosing wrongly may also lead to pitfalls. What are your selection criteria?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektButStillHerevip
· 23h ago
Honestly, it's the same old spiel... Projects with real vitality have already gained a reputation in the community, why do you need to pick? I've stepped into too many pits, now I only care if the founders are continuously building; everything else is superficial. How about flow and immutable? Has anyone been discussing them recently?
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 23h ago
Basically, it's about betting on luck, betting that the team won't run away, everything else is just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 23h ago
Honestly, I'm tired of hearing the word "turning point." Last year it was "turning point," the year before it was "turning point," and we're still talking about it now, haha. Staying calm and making careful choices is the right approach, but I think the key still depends on who is truly building. Projects that are constantly making noise on Twitter tend to be the first to collapse. Three is too few; I would rather diversify. I'd prefer a smaller proportion rather than going all in on one.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresentvip
· 23h ago
Honestly, there are very few projects that can truly survive; most are just fleeting moments of brilliance. Actually, the hardest part isn't choosing the right project, but not being greedy, everyone. That's the usual pattern: a reliable team, genuine users, decent liquidity—that's basically it.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugsvip
· 23h ago
It sounds good, but it's all about who can resist the urge to buy the dip. Most people are rational in words but act impulsively. Projects with real vitality have long been locked down by institutions, while retail investors are still struggling to pick just 3. Liquidity is the most painful point. Good projects often have poor liquidity, and those with good liquidity are all pump-and-dump coins, creating a deadlock.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 23h ago
Honestly, I'm still struggling to pick which 3 to choose and haven't figured out the trick yet. The key is who can survive until the next bear market. Only projects that a team is seriously working on are truly worth paying attention to. Having stepped on the坑, I know that liquidity really is a life-and-death line.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)