Blockchain finance has reached a point where privacy and regulation are often seen as mutually exclusive options—either complete anonymity or full transparency. But the real financial world is far from that absolute.



Looking at Dusk Network's recent progress, they've found an interesting approach. It's not about bypassing regulation or sacrificing privacy, but rather using cryptographic technology to create a feasible bridge between the two. The core tool is Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP)—sounds complex, but it's essentially allowing transaction details to be hidden while enabling auditors to "selectively disclose" specific information. An issuer of a security token can use this solution to protect sensitive business data while generating real-time verifiable compliance reports, handling both sides effectively.

This actually addresses a major challenge in bringing traditional finance onto the blockchain. Many institutions want to move assets on-chain but get stuck due to insufficient privacy or compliance risks. Dusk's technical solution effectively gives a green light to these applications. Especially in the realm of RWA (Real World Assets), the on-chain representation of debt, equity, and fund shares requires a foundational layer that can support complex permission structures and prove compliance through technology. This is precisely Dusk's main battleground.

What's even more interesting is that they are not just making promises in whitepapers. The testnet has already run privacy smart contracts and compliance verification modules, and projects focused on this direction are beginning to emerge in the ecosystem. This indicates that the technology is no longer just theoretical but is starting to have practical applications. Blockchain truly empowering financial institutions might look like this—not by revolution, but by finding a path that everyone can walk, while maintaining their respective bottom lines.
DUSK9.5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWitchvip
· 16h ago
Oh, this idea is indeed good. Finally, someone is seriously tackling this problem. The selective disclosure approach is interesting—since privacy and regulation must coexist, let the data speak for itself. But the question is, can this scheme really run at scale? Testnets are one thing, but will mainnets be another story? RWA definitely needs such infrastructure, but it feels like Dusk still needs to prove itself further. Are there many projects actually being implemented? Having technology alone without users is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 21h ago
This is the right approach, not a black-and-white confrontation, but using technology to find a balance point. The sustainability of ZKP technology is indeed worth watching, especially in the application scenarios of RWA — truly solving the compliance pain points of institutional on-chain activities. This is what quality leverage should look like.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 21h ago
The whole idea of zero-knowledge proofs, honestly, is like wanting to eat two meals... But Dusk's approach is indeed clear-headed, much more reliable than those projects that are all black or white. Having papers alone is useless; the key is whether the testnet runs smoothly, only then can we speak. RWA (Real-World Assets) institutions have indeed been stuck for a long time; privacy and compliance must be handled on both fronts. Only with technological breakthroughs can there be hope. On-chain traditional finance is not a dream; it all depends on who can solve this contradiction first. The selective disclosure setup is clever; it can pass audits and not fully expose data. Can regulation and privacy truly coexist?
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurkervip
· 21h ago
Finally, someone has understood the relationship between privacy and regulation, moving away from the old black-and-white approach.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 21h ago
That's right, the ZKP approach indeed addresses the pain points. However, to be honest, only a few projects can truly be implemented. Dusk's recent operations are quite impressive; finally, someone has balanced privacy and compliance well. RWA on-chain is only a matter of time; the key is that the underlying technology must be reliable, or it will all be for nothing. This is what blockchain should be doing—not reckless disruption, but genuinely helping financial institutions solve problems. All talk aside, the testnet needs to run smoothly to count; we'll see the real effect once it officially launches. The balance between privacy and compliance has finally been found; this approach is worth learning from. The selective disclosure setting really seems to solve major issues in traditional finance. But the real test is still ahead—whether it can truly attract institutions to adopt it.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 22h ago
I think zero-knowledge proofs are definitely worth paying attention to. It's not that Dusk is necessarily the only solution, but the approach is correct—privacy and compliance should coexist rather than be in opposition. Traditional financial institutions are most afraid of losing control over transparency once on-chain, and Dusk offers a viable approach that can be accepted. RWA (Real-World Assets) indeed require such infrastructure; otherwise, asset onboarding will always be stuck at the approval stage. But we still need to see how the testnet performs later. Too much focus on papers and hype; only real applications that can run smoothly count.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)