Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Don't think that your collateral on the blockchain is safe just because PancakeSwap has upgraded a contract. Assets in Lista DAO could end up in ICU.
This is not alarmist. Putting money into smart contracts does save worry, but the DeFi Lego system often hides risks within layered dependencies—if the underlying layer encounters problems, everything above it collapses.
Lista DAO allows users to use PancakeSwap's LP Token as collateral, which seems like an innovative breakthrough in liquidity. In reality, it ties the fate of the entire protocol to the upgrade cycle of a third party. This is called external dependency risk.
How exactly can problems occur? Suppose PancakeSwap upgrades to V4, or if a logical bug is found in the code requiring urgent fixing, Lista's oracle might instantly fail to read correct data, and the liquidation module could also become invalid. LP Tokens are not standard assets; they are complex contract credentials—if the underlying interface becomes incompatible, these collateral assets turn into unliquidatable "bad debts."
Your risk hedging isn't just about the security of Lista's code; you also have to bet that PancakeSwap won't stumble with each upgrade. That’s a pretty big gamble.