Building a scalable technology platform faces real structural challenges when operating under a foundation-based non-profit model. The tension between rapid technological iteration and governance constraints becomes increasingly apparent as projects mature. Recent developments in Zcash highlight this exact dilemma—how do you balance decentralized governance requirements with the operational demands of scaling a blockchain infrastructure? The foundation structure, while essential for legitimacy and regulatory compliance, can sometimes slow decision-making and resource allocation compared to traditional tech companies. This raises important questions about whether alternative governance models might better serve projects aiming for genuine mass adoption and technological advancement in the crypto ecosystem.

ZEC-9.64%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlackervip
· 19h ago
Zcash is actually a dead end; the foundation model is just tying itself up in shackles.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphetvip
· 19h ago
As for Zcash, to be honest, it's still a fundamental issue inherent in the foundation model; you can't rush it faster.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者vip
· 19h ago
The foundation model is a dilemma—want to be compliant and decentralized, but everything ends up being half a beat behind.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)