Traditional cloud storage has always faced a challenge—data loss due to server crashes, high costs, and the risk of user privacy leaks. The Walrus protocol fundamentally changes this logic with a decentralized architecture.



Its core innovation lies in adopting a thousand-point distributed storage model. It no longer relies on a single central server but disperses data across multiple nodes in the network. This way, even if a node encounters issues, data integrity remains intact. Technically, this architecture naturally avoids the vulnerabilities of centralized storage.

Looking at the WAL token design, it not only incentivizes nodes to participate but also optimizes network quality through a penalty mechanism—short-term staking behaviors and inefficient nodes are constrained, while long-term stable nodes receive better rewards. This economic model ensures the healthy operation of the network rather than a fleeting boom followed by decline.

From the ecosystem data, the Walrus testnet has already attracted deployment from over a thousand projects. Although still in the early stages, this scale demonstrates market recognition. The demand for decentralized storage is real, and Walrus is actively filling this gap with concrete actions.
WAL-2.6%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WalletDetectivevip
· 18h ago
A thousand nodes distributed storage, sounds good, but can it really operate stably? --- Another decentralized storage project, the old trick of Web3 transforming traditional industries... --- Over a thousand projects in the testnet? This data needs to be verified, or it’s just hype. --- The penalty mechanism design of WAL is quite interesting, definitely better than those chaotic projects. --- Privacy leaks are indeed a pain point, but is distributed storage necessarily more secure? I have some doubts. --- Can costs really be reduced? Don’t end up turning into another way of cutting the leeks. --- This architecture is theoretically reliable, but how does it perform in practice? The stability of the production environment is the key. --- I’m optimistic about the node incentive mechanism, but in the long run, will WAL tokens fall into the same old inflationary trap? --- Distributed storage is indeed a necessity, but why can Walrus stand out? --- Early project data usually looks good; the key is how many are still in use after a year.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugsvip
· 18h ago
It's the same story of decentralized storage again, it all sounds similar... but the setup with a thousand nodes is indeed reliable.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 18h ago
To be honest, distributed storage should have been used a long time ago. I'm already tired of the cloud vendors' antics. Worried about data loss if they run away? Want privacy? You have to pay for it. The Walrus approach is indeed comfortable. A thousand projects are already up and running? That shows it's not just hype.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomadvip
· 19h ago
Decentralized Thousand-Point Distribution? Sounds good, but I'm worried it's just talk on paper. --- Walrus definitely has some substance this time; the penalty mechanism is quite strict. --- Wait, is recognition enough for over a thousand projects on the testnet? It still seems a bit superficial to me. --- Decentralized storage has long needed someone to do it, but how the WAL token is designed is the key. --- Centralized cloud storage issues are indeed annoying, but can Walrus truly solve privacy concerns? --- The idea of a distributed architecture is good; it all depends on whether node incentives can genuinely attract participation. --- Another protocol, will it survive the testnet this time? Question mark.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)