#稳定币发展与应用 Seeing the topic of asset tokenization, I was reminded of recent discussions with a few friends. The judgment that Ethereum and Solana each have their strengths is quite interesting — it's not a competition of one over the other, but rather showcasing their respective advantages in different scenarios. Ethereum hosts the majority of stablecoins and core economic activities, with a significantly leading asset scale, indicating a more solid trust foundation; Solana's advantage in high-frequency trading efficiency suits another set of needs.

But I want to remind everyone that when seeing these growth opportunities, don't be blinded by the wave. Asset tokenization is indeed a major trend, but no matter how good the track is, we need to maintain a clear sense of position management. The gap of $183.7 billion and $15.9 billion didn't form overnight; it results from long-term accumulation and risk sedimentation. Any participation in new opportunities should be done with funds you can afford to test the waters, not all-in.

In the long run, the improvement of such infrastructure is beneficial to the entire ecosystem. But the premise of good things is that we first manage risks well ourselves. Don't let optimism about the future become a reason to neglect current safety.