I am an ordinary investor. A few months ago, I first came into contact with DUSK, and like most people, a thought popped into my mind: "Another new coin?" Then I thought again, and decided to dig deeper.

A friend who works in traditional finance once told me something that really touched me: "Think about it, what's the most tangled issue on Wall Street right now? They want to move assets onto the blockchain but are worried that once on-chain, everything will be fully transparent, and every transaction will be thoroughly scrutinized." This statement gave me a new perspective.

I started researching and reviewing information until I clarified my thoughts. To put it simply, what DUSK wants is: to provide a "privacy umbrella" for large transactions in the blockchain world.

It sounds simple, but the logic is clear—big players need to conduct transactions with peace of mind, and their privacy must be protected; at the same time, the entire operational system must be compliant and licensed, meeting regulatory standards. This way, privacy is protected without crossing legal boundaries.

Only then did I realize that DUSK is not competing with millions of meme coins for popularity; it is solving a real problem that only blockchain can better address: how to securely, legally, and efficiently migrate trillions of dollars of traditional financial assets onto the chain.

The technical details used by the project (like zero-knowledge proofs) I honestly don’t understand thoroughly. But I understand the logic: as more and more real-world assets demand on-chain presence, the need for privacy and compliance is no longer a bonus but a must-have. As a "infrastructure" providing these core capabilities, DUSK may continue to be needed by those who require it.

Of course, I am not blindly optimistic. Investing always carries risks, especially for infrastructure projects that require long-term development, so caution is necessary. But logically speaking, this direction is worth paying attention to.