2026-01-10 06:24:57

Many people love to chase trendy projects, but they often overlook a key point — the true factor that determines how far an ecosystem can go is the quality of its infrastructure.

Walrus Protocol clearly understands this, focusing on the core pain point of data storage, avoiding system bottlenecks caused by single points of failure, and greatly enhancing overall reliability. Compared to those projects that follow the hype, this pragmatic approach is indeed more stable.

The performance of the $WAL token also confirms this. Its value generally correlates closely with the actual usage depth of the network — the more people use it, the higher the demand, and the more obvious the token’s role as an ecosystem incentive. This is also why the infrastructure sector is worth long-term attention.

WAL-3,32%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForumLurker

· 17h ago

Infrastructure is indeed easy to overlook, but the projects that truly survive are rooted in this way. I think the idea behind Walrus is fine; the demand for data storage is indeed a necessity, unlike those flashy gimmicks. The fact that $WAL is closely tied to usage depth is very important, indicating that the token's value is not just speculation but has real support.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 17h ago

Hmm... Infrastructure is indeed easy to overlook, but according to my quantitative model, the technical outlook for $WAL still requires observing more cycle data before drawing conclusions. Honestly, there are too many people chasing hot trends, all trying to make quick money. Little do they know that projects like Walrus, which quietly focus on infrastructure, are actually more resilient to risks. But don't be completely fooled by this logic; historical data shows that infrastructure projects are often quite dull in the early stages. If you choose the wrong entry point, you can still go bankrupt. Data speaks, but market sentiment also matters. You need to consider both. Wait... Is WAL really positively correlated with trading depth? I need to run the data myself again to verify this correlation—don't let the narrative set the pace. The infrastructure track is worth watching, but is the current macro cycle really suitable for long-term holding? I'm a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

WealthCoffee

· 18h ago

The infrastructure sector has indeed been seriously underestimated. Everyone is thinking about getting rich overnight, and approaches like Walrus are actually more appealing.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationAlert