2026-01-10 06:28:24

Looking back, every year I've created on Solana holds real meaning. These aren't just random mints—they're historical records. During the toughest periods when adoption was low and the community felt sparse, I kept pushing forward with art creation. That commitment shows up on-chain, a testament to believing in the ecosystem before the boom times. Those early mints? They're proof of what it takes to build through the cycles.

SOL0,25%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SnapshotDayLaborer

· 8h ago

The batch of early investors should have doubled now, right? I'm jealous haha

View OriginalReply0

CryptoHistoryClass

· 17h ago

ah yes, the classic "i was here before it was cool" narrative—statistically speaking, this is exactly how every bubble survivor rewrites their timeline. those early mints hit different when the chart goes up, don't they? funny how nobody talks about the thousands who created through bear markets and still got rekt anyway. pattern recognition 101: survivorship bias masquerading as vision.

Reply0

TokenStorm

· 17h ago

On-chain data shows that the early minting holdings had an unbelievably low cost basis. Looking back at the backtest chart now, it's simply a perfect example of bottom fishing. I can only say I admire your risk management skills.

View OriginalReply0

DegenRecoveryGroup

· 17h ago

Early on-chain records are truly the strongest proof. Those who persisted through the bear market are now laughing last.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 18h ago

actually™ the on-chain footprint thing is lowkey the only metric that matters here. everyone larps about "believing in the ecosystem" but your tx history? that's immutable proof. the weak hands always exit when adoption dips... you didn't. empirically speaking, that's alpha

Reply0