2026-01-10 06:28:28

The blockchain market has always been balancing privacy and compliance, and Dusk provides an interesting answer using zero-knowledge proof technology.

What is its approach? On-chain transactions can ensure security while also being auditable. This may sound contradictory, but it is indeed feasible. More importantly, it has started to support real-world financial scenarios, not just limited to pure digital asset interactions.

From a governance perspective, $DUSK's role in the network is more than just a token—it relates to the secure operation and governance decisions of the entire ecosystem. This makes me think that the project's considerations are indeed profound.

Whether you are a quantitative developer or focused on compliance, this direction is worth paying attention to.

DUSK11,69%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GovernancePretender

· 17h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed quite interesting; can privacy and auditing be achieved simultaneously? I need to see how they do it. Dusk's approach is quite innovative, integrating traditional financial logic... but whether it can be practically implemented is the real question. The governance weight design of $DUSK is the core, not just issuing tokens. Honestly, this direction is much more reliable than most vaporware projects. Compliance is truly a necessity; quantitative big players will definitely pay attention. How to satisfy both privacy and transparency at the same time? Dusk has probably provided a way. If this technical solution really works, it could indeed change some things... but it still depends on how far practical applications can go.

View OriginalReply0

StakoorNeverSleeps

· 17h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive, but the key is whether Dusk can be implemented in RWA.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 17h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs, to be honest, I've heard about them many times before. Has Dusk really brought this to fruition this time? Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? It sounds like wanting both the fish and the bear paw. I need to see the actual results to believe it. Real-world financial scenarios? Hmm, that's interesting. But can it truly integrate with traditional finance? It still feels uncertain. If the governance design of $DUSK is truly deep, it will depend on the subsequent execution. A good white paper alone isn't enough. Quant traders have long been eyeing projects like this. I'm more concerned about whether it will become another air token. Compliance narratives do tend to attract institutions, but it's already 2024 and they're still talking about this. Feels a bit out of sync. Zero-knowledge proofs themselves are fine; I'm just worried it might become another marketing gimmick. Actual application remains the same. This idea is indeed innovative, but there are too many such promises in the market. Let's wait until we see real data before judging.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 17h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed powerful; privacy and compliance can truly be achieved together. Honestly, can they audit while hiding private information? I need to ponder this logic. Dusk's approach to penetrating real-world finance is quite imaginative, unlike those projects that only focus on pure chain gaming. The governance weight of $DUSK seems underestimated; it's the core of ecosystem security. Quantitative analysts must pay attention, and compliance enthusiasts should follow as well—this field is heating up. This is the kind of thing that should be researched: solving real problems rather than just hype. Wait, are zero-knowledge proofs really that reliable? Is there a possibility they could be cracked in the future? I just want to know when this technology can truly be applied in real-world scenarios; right now, it's still in the conceptual stage. Compared to that, how is the tokenomics design of $DUSK? Has anyone analyzed it? It definitely has depth, but I want to see how they cooperate with major institutions. The entire 2024 is about finding this balance; Dusk is probably a pioneer.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 18h ago

ZK this set is indeed the breaking point; privacy compliance can now meet the need that should have appeared long ago. There aren't many projects truly daring to touch RWA. I am optimistic about Dusk taking this path. The design of $DUSK governance weight is solid; it's not just a showpiece coin. Wait, explain the ZK audit logic to me again—how to achieve both privacy and transparency. After LSD, now it's RWA's turn. Those who catch this wave shouldn't say they had no chance.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 18h ago

Privacy compliance win-win sounds great, but can Dusk really pull it off? It depends on the execution later. $DUSK's governance logic is indeed more innovative than most projects. Zero-knowledge proofs in traditional finance will only be valuable once the path is proven to work. Oh wait, now everyone claims to support compliance; the key is whether they can survive the regulatory hurdle. It's interesting, but what about tokenomics? Has anyone studied it? Feels like this direction will be very attractive to institutional investors.

View OriginalReply0