Spotted a critical structural flaw in some protocol designs. When the developer and creator are the same entity, it creates a cascade of problems worth examining:



This centralization breeds persistent PVP dynamics—constant competitive friction instead of collaboration. Worse, it incentivizes farming dev fees at the expense of actual creators, who end up unrewarded for their contribution.

The incentive structure is fundamentally broken. For devs evaluating protocols: this dependency model needs immediate architectural review.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 1
  • 1
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-8a71d72cvip
· 8h ago
If you don't understand PVP, hurry up and go now, or you'll miss the train.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)