After years of observing DeFi projects, one phenomenon has become increasingly evident—compliance and privacy are being artificially pitted against each other. In simple terms, the technical solutions have always existed; it's just that too many projects are too lazy to implement them.



Currently, projects either claim to be compliant, tightly holding user privacy, turning DeFi into on-chain banks; or they embrace extreme decentralization, outright rejecting regulatory adaptation, ultimately just self-hyping within small circles, with institutional funds unwilling to get close.

Recently, I started paying attention to a certain DeFi ecosystem project mainly because its approach is not extreme. It uses a layered privacy KYC framework, not to scrutinize user details, but to give users the choice. If you want a zero-threshold experience, you can; if you want to connect real assets to increase yields, you can unlock compliance permissions in tiers. User data is not monopolized by the project—this is what DeFi should look like.

What’s even more impressive is its transparency requirements for ecosystem cooperation. Many projects in the crypto space rely on PPT pie-in-the-sky promises, with actual implementation entirely dependent on luck. But this project openly discloses license progress, regulatory updates, and cooperation details, allowing users to verify for themselves. In the short term, it may not be as flashy as hype, but long-term trust accumulation is the real asset.

Ultimately, what DeFi needs is not wavering compromises between idealism and realism, but the infrastructure to find that balance. The crypto world isn’t short of dramatic rises and falls; what’s most lacking is an ecosystem that allows people to participate with confidence for the long term.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasBanditvip
· 16h ago
Wait a minute, can this layered privacy framework really be implemented, or is it just a new bottle in an old wine bottle? Honestly, I’m a bit skeptical. When it comes to compliance options, it sounds simple, but in practice, how much black box space is there? It's already 2024, and we're still talking about transparency. Those big institutions have long been cut through once. That said, truly user-selectable projects are indeed few and far between, which is worth paying attention to. On the surface, it's a balance point; to be blunt, it's about not offending either side. How can users be ultimately protected?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfervip
· 16h ago
This idea is indeed correct, but the key is still execution ability. How many projects can truly be坚持下来的?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-beba108dvip
· 17h ago
This logic is a bit off; compliance and privacy are not mutually exclusive. It all depends on who is willing to genuinely implement them.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)