Recently, the Chinese meme coin ecosystem has been on a full rally, and market enthusiasm remains high. Various creative tokens are emerging one after another, from puns to cultural references, as investors' imaginations are fully unleashed here.
Interestingly, many projects are leveraging marketing strategies. But compared to that, those ultra-meme projects deployed directly on the mainnet without any packaging are actually more distinctive. Take projects like Spurdo, for example—they don't rely on flashy promotion; they are purely driven by meme culture itself to energize the community—this raw, organic characteristic, to some extent, is more resilient than those follow-the-trend projects.
From a market perspective, this wave of meme coin surges not only reflects increased community activity but also indicates that the market is looking for new narratives. Whether this window can be seized depends ultimately on whether the project can maintain its popularity and value consensus.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DiamondHands
· 01-10 08:35
Real meme content is more interesting; those flashy packaged ones are just annoying.
---
Spurdo is indeed something pure, but how long it can last remains to be seen.
---
Community popularity is虚的; real gold and silver are the hard indicators. Don't be fooled by narratives.
---
Ultimately, it depends on who can maintain the popularity. Most meme coins are just fleeting moments.
---
Extreme meme projects sound good, but the risks are high. Has anyone really made money from them?
---
This surge is just a hype cycle. Don't take it too seriously; stop-loss is necessary.
---
Original ecological attributes do add points, but market logic is what truly determines life and death.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpster
· 01-10 08:34
Manipulative meme coins are just like this
---
Can Spurdo, this bare-bones project, really survive? I doubt it
---
Flashy marketing is indeed annoying, but projects without hype tend to die even faster
---
Window period? Bro, this wave is already at the end, don’t be oblivious
---
Pure meme-driven communities? Sounds nice, but actually just about stirring up the atmosphere
---
It’s the same old "original ecology" spiel, many projects have hyped this up
---
Chinese meme coins are indeed popular, but the next crash isn’t far off
---
Maintaining hype sounds easy, but in reality, no one can beat time
---
Narrative points? Now everywhere are the wreckage of projects with broken consensus
---
Behind this round of rise, it’s all retail investors taking the hit; no one’s exposing this
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlan
· 01-10 08:24
To be honest, those flashy, gimmicky projects are more likely to cool off.
True memes should be this pure, and the community is the core.
Projects like Spurdo just look way more solid than marketing coins.
Recently, the Chinese meme coin ecosystem has been on a full rally, and market enthusiasm remains high. Various creative tokens are emerging one after another, from puns to cultural references, as investors' imaginations are fully unleashed here.
Interestingly, many projects are leveraging marketing strategies. But compared to that, those ultra-meme projects deployed directly on the mainnet without any packaging are actually more distinctive. Take projects like Spurdo, for example—they don't rely on flashy promotion; they are purely driven by meme culture itself to energize the community—this raw, organic characteristic, to some extent, is more resilient than those follow-the-trend projects.
From a market perspective, this wave of meme coin surges not only reflects increased community activity but also indicates that the market is looking for new narratives. Whether this window can be seized depends ultimately on whether the project can maintain its popularity and value consensus.