Hashpower projects need to be implemented, and the key points are twofold: first, how to coordinate the operation of diverse machines; second, who verifies the results after computation and how to distribute the rewards.
$cys's approach is straightforward. First, use a relatively centralized method to run through the process, with the goal of verifying whether ZK proofs can be scheduled and support collaboration in an actual system. Once feasibility is confirmed, the network will gradually open up. Introduce verifiers to check results, hashpower providers to contribute computing resources, and stakers to provide economic guarantees—all three parties working under the same set of rules.
This evolutionary approach is very pragmatic—rather than decentralizing from the start, it first ensures technical feasibility, then gradually moves toward decentralization. ZK proofs make computations verifiable, multi-role participation creates a self-consistent incentive mechanism, ultimately forming a self-operating system.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldChaser
· 01-11 13:25
Focus first, then diversify. I like this approach much more than those who immediately boast about decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 01-11 13:24
This approach is pretty good; first focus on validation and then gradually open up. It's much more reliable than those hyped-up claims.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 01-11 13:22
Concentrate first, then disperse. This tactic is indeed clever, but on the other hand, can ZK proofs really handle such complex scheduling? It's a bit uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuyer
· 01-11 13:11
This approach is indeed solid—first verify the technology before decentralization, unlike some projects that start by boasting about decentralization dreams.
Hashpower projects need to be implemented, and the key points are twofold: first, how to coordinate the operation of diverse machines; second, who verifies the results after computation and how to distribute the rewards.
$cys's approach is straightforward. First, use a relatively centralized method to run through the process, with the goal of verifying whether ZK proofs can be scheduled and support collaboration in an actual system. Once feasibility is confirmed, the network will gradually open up. Introduce verifiers to check results, hashpower providers to contribute computing resources, and stakers to provide economic guarantees—all three parties working under the same set of rules.
This evolutionary approach is very pragmatic—rather than decentralizing from the start, it first ensures technical feasibility, then gradually moves toward decentralization. ZK proofs make computations verifiable, multi-role participation creates a self-consistent incentive mechanism, ultimately forming a self-operating system.