2026-01-15 03:30:43

#Strategy加仓BTC Recently noticed two very representative publicly traded companies: one is MicroStrategy, which takes Bitcoin reserves as the flagship of its core strategy, and the other is BMNR, which has made big moves in Ethereum allocation and is said to be considering acquiring 5% of Ethereum's total circulating supply. But frankly, looking at the stock performance of these two companies, I have to say I'm a bit disappointed—the stock trends are too closely correlated with Bitcoin, almost on the same line.

This is quite interesting. If these companies' stocks continue to underperform, I might have to question my outlook on Bitcoin's future. Especially since there are no signs of interest rate cuts in the first half of 2026, which makes the overall market a bit tense. Of course, this is just my personal opinion—nothing is certain, because the market always has surprises.

What do you all think about these two companies and their underlying asset allocation logic? Drop a comment, let's discuss.

BTC-0.04%

ETH0.43%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Tokenomics911

· 10h ago

MicroStrategy's recent moves indeed took a bit of a hit; the stock price is tied too tightly to the coin price, which isn't interesting.

View OriginalReply0

quiet_lurker

· 10h ago

Stock prices are more tightly correlated with Bitcoin than expected, which is outrageous. It's better to just buy coins directly.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForMemes

· 10h ago

MicroStrategy's recent moves are indeed a bit of a gamble, completely acting as a puppet for Bitcoin. If stocks and crypto prices are synchronized to this extent, it’s better to just buy crypto directly—why take such a long detour? There were no interest rate cuts in the first half of 2026, and this pace is really uncomfortable... but I still remain optimistic about BTC. What can I say? I really don’t understand how BMNR’s big 5% Ethereum move was planned; it feels a bit too aggressive. Before interest rate cuts come, the stocks of these companies will probably stay flat for a while longer. Don’t rush.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 10h ago

Wait, is the stock price moving completely in sync with BTC? There's something behind this... The big players are probably engaging in coordinated arbitrage, right? Am I right?

View OriginalReply0

FUDwatcher

· 10h ago

Bro, MSTR's move is basically betting on BTC, nothing fancy. MicroStrategy buying so much BTC just for show, it's a publicly traded company pretending to be a crypto trader. I'm really worried about the fact that there's no hope for interest rate cuts in 2026.

View OriginalReply0

FudVaccinator

· 11h ago

MicroStrategy's recent moves do have a bit of a gambler's vibe, and it's really awkward when stocks and crypto prices are on the same line.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleDreamer

· 11h ago

The gameplay of MicroStrategy is basically betting on BTC, right? The stock premium space is limited. BMNR needs 5% circulating supply? That's a bit overambitious, my friend. Stocks not rising makes me more optimistic about on-chain data, regardless of what listed companies think. The prospect of interest rate cuts being far off is indeed pretty frustrating; short-term sentiment can be easily swayed. Basically, it's about who can endure this round of volatility; capital won't burn money for nothing. In the first half of 2026, I think it's important to prepare psychologically and not get caught off guard. Asset allocation logic? It's just about wanting a piece of the pie; nothing particularly special. Two companies' stock prices are tracking BTC closely, indicating the market still hasn't figured out how to assign a premium. This logic is actually quite fragile; one black swan event and it's all over. If interest rate cuts remain elusive, these "big moves" in allocation will eventually come back.

View OriginalReply0