2026-01-15 07:00:31

Looking at the performance of a certain top public chain, to be honest, it's a bit disappointing. Trading volume is lukewarm, ecosystem projects show no signs of growth, and user enthusiasm is far below expectations. This is the core issue—there are not enough incentive mechanisms, and the community and developers lack the motivation to participate. With all this, do you still expect the public chain to explode on its own? Most public chain ecosystems are actually the same; without some sweeteners, who would be willing to bother? It seems that only through real financial support policies and operations can the ecosystem truly be revitalized. This is the current state of the entire industry, not just an isolated project issue.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 5h ago

If you don't have money to invest, don't expect the ecosystem to take off. That's the current state of public chains. Lackluster performance is truly disappointing, but what can burning money solve... Sooner or later, true ability will be the deciding factor. The incentive mechanism is indeed broken; developers are all flocking to places with money. Everyone wants to reap the benefits of the ecosystem, but who will do the work? The problem isn't the chain itself, but people's hearts. In plain terms, there's no killer app; just throwing money around won't help.

View OriginalReply0

MergeConflict

· 5h ago

Basically, it's just a lack of funds to invest in the ecosystem, so there's nothing to attract people. This round of public chains are all exploring; whoever finds the right incentive model wins. Instead of waiting for your own breakout, it's better to directly invest funds—that's the real way. If the ecosystem isn't strong, it's not really a technical problem; it's just that people are reluctant to spend money. Everyone knows this deep down—without subsidies, no one will play this game with you. Public chains are also quite miserable; it's really either a technical issue or a money problem. If the incentive mechanism isn't well-designed, it's like wasting the potential of the entire public chain.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoTarotReader

· 5h ago

Honestly, the current public blockchains are like this—without real gold and silver, who would work hard for you?

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 5h ago

Basically, now building public chains is a money-burning game, and without incentives, no one will do the work. The poor state of the public chain ecosystem is not a technical issue; it's just that they are reluctant to spend money. Honestly, without competing in subsidies, you simply can't attract developers. That's the reality. Everyone is waiting for the right moment, but in the end, they all lie flat. No wonder they perform poorly. Give developers real cash, and the ecosystem can thrive; otherwise, it's all empty talk. In this round of public chain competition, you need to have assets in your wallet, or everything is pointless. Instead of just talking about ecosystem development, it's better to directly burn money to support projects; the results are obvious. Most public chains are in this state. Who dares to say their ecosystem is truly thriving?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 5h ago

The incentive mechanism is indeed a huge problem; without real money, no one will pay attention.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 5h ago

Isn't this just a replay of the old tricks from the early internet? Reminds me of the portal websites in the 90s—no matter how much money they spent on subsidies, they couldn't keep people. Honestly, you need something genuine. Public chains currently lack this; they only have incentives but no cultural heritage worth staying for.

View OriginalReply0