2026-01-17 02:33:15

Anchorage Digital is stirring up significant interest in the digital asset space with reports suggesting the firm could secure up to $400 million in funding. The custody and staking specialist, a key player in institutional crypto adoption, has sparked IPO speculation as rumors circulate about its potential public market debut. Such a move would signal growing institutional confidence in the Web3 infrastructure sector and could mark another milestone for firms serving traditional finance's expansion into digital assets.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoneyBurner

· 01-17 03:02

400 million USD in new offerings, Anchorage's institutional buy-in is becoming more and more apparent, and on-chain data has been telling the story all along. For those of us who entered early, don't sleep on this—building positions might be an opportunity? From 400M financing to IPO, I've seen this pattern too many times—buy the dip first.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirter

· 01-17 03:01

400 million dollars in funding? Is Anchorage going public? Traditional finance is really about to fully embrace blockchain.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 01-17 03:01

Is this another new trick to cut leeks? $400m in funding and they can go public—I've seen through this routine already --- Is Anchorage really going to IPO? Let's wait and see if it's just talk --- Custody is indeed a necessity, but does institutional entry necessarily mean reliability... I remain skeptical --- Wake up, everyone, this is the trap they’re setting for traditional finance --- $400 million? Why not use it for genuine ecosystem development instead --- Institutional confidence +1, but I bet the valuation after this round of funding is even more inflated

View OriginalReply0