2026-01-21 13:10:14

#数字资产市场动态 On-chain transparency has become a double-edged sword

As transaction activity becomes more frequent, everything on the blockchain can be checked and viewed—this was originally a feature, but now it has become a bottleneck. Enterprises do not want to expose competitive data, and users also do not want their privacy to be compromised.

The approach to the privacy track has changed in recent years. It’s not about preventing you from checking, but about changing the method: data can be verified, but not necessarily fully public. This is the truly imaginative solution. $DUSK is a typical representative of this idea, finding a balance between verifiability and privacy protection.

The key still depends on whether this set of solutions can be applied to real-world scenarios. If commercial applications and personal finance fields can truly be implemented, the entire privacy finance track will take off, and $DUSK , as an early player, will naturally benefit. Now it all depends on execution.

DUSK9.68%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleStalker

· 6h ago

Haha, transparency has gone overboard and turned into a pitfall, this is the fate of Web3. --- Verifiability does not mean full exposure; this idea is indeed interesting. --- It sounds good, but the key is to really implement it; otherwise, it's just air. --- Early players? Is it already too late to join now... --- When it comes to privacy finance, it really depends on how regulators set the tone. --- From transparency to privacy, going in circles, Web3 is always swaying. --- The logic of verifiability is clever, but I'm worried that the technology can't realize the vision. --- Corporate privacy vs. user privacy are inherently contradictory; what about balancing them? --- Execution? My friend, after so many years in the crypto world, execution is just a joke. --- Feels like another story being told; let's wait until an app is actually in use before saying more.

View OriginalReply0

PuzzledScholar

· 6h ago

Hmm... Transparency seems to be a double-edged sword. Public chains should have thought of this problem long ago. Verifiability does not equal full transparency—this idea is indeed clever, but can it really be implemented, bro? The DUSK approach is good, but I'm worried it might just be another PowerPoint governance scheme. Early players have an advantage, but poor execution could make it all pointless. Is the privacy finance boom coming? Or is it just another wave of concept hype?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 6h ago

Transparency was originally a virtue, but now it has become a curse — this is a lesson that cycles teach all idealists. The real issue isn't technology; it's that human nature isn't ready to be exposed. $DUSK This set of verifiable invisibility logic sounds good, but in practice? Haha... How many times have we heard such promises. The words "execution" may sound easy, but only through enduring a bear market can true strength be revealed.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBarber

· 6h ago

Transparency has indeed backfired; now everyone wants to block something. Long ago, we praised transparency as an advantage of Web3, but now we realize that privacy is the real need. Verifiable invisibility? Sounds good, but let's see if DUSK can truly be implemented.

View OriginalReply0