The Governor of the Bank of Italy, Fabio Panetta, recently made a statement that highlights a core issue in the digital currency ecosystem.



His view is straightforward: in the future, digital currencies of commercial banks and central bank digital currencies will become the two main pillars of the monetary system. These two will jointly maintain the operation of the entire system, while stablecoins? They are just a supporting role.

Why does he say this? Panetta believes that the key to stablecoins lies in — their stability must be anchored to fiat currency. This inherent dependency limits the space for stablecoins to operate independently within the financial system. In other words, stablecoins are essentially supplementary to fiat currency, not substitutes.

In contrast, once central bank digital currencies and commercial bank currencies are fully digitalized, they can form a complementary rather than adversarial relationship, truly supporting the stable operation of the modern monetary system. This judgment also reflects the latest thinking of global central banks on the digital currency ecosystem — technological upgrades are a means, but the essential properties of money and the stability of the financial system are the ultimate goals.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StakoorNeverSleepsvip
· 7h ago
Stablecoins are essentially working for fiat currency, and there's nothing wrong with that. But can central bank digital currencies really replace commercial banks? I'm skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinkingvip
· 7h ago
Stablecoins are just followers of fiat currency. The central bank has long seen through this. But on the other hand, can CBDC really solve the problem? It still feels like an ideal scenario.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofstervip
· 7h ago
nah panetta's just describing the obvious architectural constraint here... stablecoins are literally just wrappers around fiat, no cryptographic guarantee of independence whatsoever
Reply0
consensus_failurevip
· 7h ago
Stablecoins are just little brothers of fiat currency, everyone can see that... The key question is, can CBDCs really be much better than what we have now?
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDipsvip
· 7h ago
Stablecoins are just being sidelined, the central bank's move is quite ruthless... Fiat currency anchoring is inherently a shackles, where's the decentralization that was promised?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)